Nationals Fibre to the home/premise, Yay or Nay?
Moderator: The Mod Squad
- rolla_fxgt
- Toyspeed Member
- Posts: 1641
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 10:54 pm
- Location: Rotorua
Nationals Fibre to the home/premise, Yay or Nay?
I'm sure most of you would of heard that national is proposing fibre to the home/premise or alternatives where better suited.
Do people think its a great idea?
Thoughts?
Do people think its a great idea?
Thoughts?
Ending up with spare parts in assembling things since 1983
- Mr Revhead
- SECURITY!
- Posts: 24635
- Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 3:06 pm
- Location: Nelson
- Contact:
As long as it doesnt cut funding from other vital services I'm fine with it, But I'm happy with my interweb at the moment, I can understand the frustrations of some people though, some rural areas just need a decent phone line fullstop, then maybe they can get xtraslow broadband
Subaru GF8 Wagon
Subaru GC8 rally car project
http://www.hccc.org.nz - Keep up to date with all motorsport events in the Wellington region
Subaru GC8 rally car project
http://www.hccc.org.nz - Keep up to date with all motorsport events in the Wellington region
- neon_spork
- Toyspeed Member
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 11:30 pm
- gurutasker
- Toyspeed Member
- Posts: 2515
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 8:24 am
- Location: Tawa, Wellington
Good idea in theory...
Proposed way of implementing. Utterly stupid.
1.) Who is going to maintain the network? Fibre is quite expensive to fix when it gets broken. Is it going to be charged out of tax / rates ?
2.) AFAIK the new "Fibre boxes" that are being installed by Telecom, are completely telecom owned. Whence they will own all the terminitation points again, and start charging other ISP's to use them. Therfore, no competition, large pricing
3.) Joint Public / Private ventures have not worked well in the past. Wellington's rail network for example. Toll gets all the profits, and the government still has to pay out of it's pocket to maintain the railway lines themselves.
Proposed way of implementing. Utterly stupid.
1.) Who is going to maintain the network? Fibre is quite expensive to fix when it gets broken. Is it going to be charged out of tax / rates ?
2.) AFAIK the new "Fibre boxes" that are being installed by Telecom, are completely telecom owned. Whence they will own all the terminitation points again, and start charging other ISP's to use them. Therfore, no competition, large pricing
3.) Joint Public / Private ventures have not worked well in the past. Wellington's rail network for example. Toll gets all the profits, and the government still has to pay out of it's pocket to maintain the railway lines themselves.
rofl Solitaire
wait thats directed at......
I'd rather get fibre to everyone than have the dole available, but thats a whole other topic
so i'm going to say yeah do it, but keep telecom out of the loop. Although i'm moving to an area with the ability to get a 25Mb connection so i'm not worried that much. (I can only afford 2Mb anyways
)
competition ftw
wait thats directed at......
I'd rather get fibre to everyone than have the dole available, but thats a whole other topic
competition ftw
- gurutasker
- Toyspeed Member
- Posts: 2515
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2005 8:24 am
- Location: Tawa, Wellington
Whos doing that? I would be amazed if someone was going to build another link - its costs a good few million a year to maintain it and there are a couple of redudant links already.gurutasker wrote:It will certainly be better if they build that competition to the southern cross cable.
Cant see the point in building another one...
AE92, KZJ120, KDJ120
- rolla_fxgt
- Toyspeed Member
- Posts: 1641
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 10:54 pm
- Location: Rotorua
solitaire wrote:Whos doing that? I would be amazed if someone was going to build another link - its costs a good few million a year to maintain it and there are a couple of redudant links already.gurutasker wrote:It will certainly be better if they build that competition to the southern cross cable.
Cant see the point in building another one...
Kordia & some aussie cable company called pipe, its going to be a tee off a cable the aussie company is building to Guam.
Also rumours of a 3rd cable too, which i think should go from Hobart to Bluff, so that if anything happens to what i assume is a cable across cook strait the south island still has interent at decent speeds & capacity
Ending up with spare parts in assembling things since 1983
- rolla_fxgt
- Toyspeed Member
- Posts: 1641
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 10:54 pm
- Location: Rotorua
d1 mule wrote:i fail to see the point in it really, its such a minor thing to be spending so much money on.
it was only in the last month that broadband user numbers exceded dial up numbers.
oh and its 75% of the population so only the major citys. what about rural and small towns...
I think 75% of the population is any town over 2000 people or homes, i don't know which, but its one of those figures anyway, if its 2000 homes, that's a town of about 8000 people, hell that means even Gore would get it
Ending up with spare parts in assembling things since 1983
Ah, i bet they just rely on the fact that telecom spends millions a year on ensuring the southern cross cable is kept up and running, cant see 3 different companies spending that sort of money for such a small populationrolla_fxgt wrote:Kordia & some aussie cable company called pipe, its going to be a tee off a cable the aussie company is building to Guam.
Also rumours of a 3rd cable too, which i think should go from Hobart to Bluff, so that if anything happens to what i assume is a cable across cook strait the south island still has interent at decent speeds & capacity
AE92, KZJ120, KDJ120




Crazy Car Motorsport