Moderator: The Mod Squad
bluemaumau wrote:didnt a s14 get 220 or something?
strx7 wrote:generally a HUB type dyno will read more HP than a rolling type dyno, also depends on the type of dyno. different brands of dynos will read different HP for the same car, end of story. Hence the only TRUE power figures are at the engine on a engine dyno
strx7 wrote:A guy in aussie got a 650HP (engine dyno) 383cu-in Commodore and stuck it on various different dyno's in both auto and manual to prove the differences in RWHP. which is what he got
Dyno Daynamics - most aussie dynos
Manual 27% less than crank
Auto 29% less than crank
Dyno Jet - most US dynos
manual 15% less than crank
auto 17% less thank crank
Dyno Pak - NZ Made Hub type
manual 9% less than crank
Auto 11% less than crank
True-No-Turbo wrote:IH8TEC wrote:
sounds about right, i got 196kw on 25psi on dyno dynamics, whereas the guys in wellington on a dyna pak get 220ish on 18psi
haha excuses excuses
IH8TEC wrote:sounds about right, i got 196kw on 25psi on dyno dynamics, whereas the guys in wellington on a dyna pak get 220ish on 18psi,
but yeah like been said, track is more an indication of power i feel
IH8TEC wrote::lol: yeah i forgot to tell him they were semi's, if he knew before he started, he would have taken longer between runs thats all,
mental note for next time
IH8TEC wrote:oh and for the people that say hub is better than rolling road.
it's a load of ar*e.
a dyno is only a tuning tool, and only as good as the operator using it.
just thought i'd put that out there
Lith wrote:Bazda wrote:bah , who needs dynos, online engine hp calculators ftw!!
Illegal drags ftw.
Return to General Car Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests