
Moderator: The Mod Squad
4agtepwr wrote:Id look for a spring with at least 50 pound seat pressure but 60 would be beter. At the end of the day I know I wouldnt go running 20 pound on stock 20v springs as there junk, but thats up to you. Mine are Performance Springs (brand) from Kelfords and they were 50 pound on the standard installed height and I had to shim them 20 thou to get them to 60 because thats the minumum i would run. $300 bucks for springs seems cheap to me in comparison to a fuc*ked block, pistons and head
4agtepwr wrote:Id look for a spring with at least 50 pound seat pressure but 60 would be beter. At the end of the day I know I wouldnt go running 20 pound on stock 20v springs as there junk, but thats up to you. Mine are Performance Springs (brand) from Kelfords and they were 50 pound on the standard installed height and I had to shim them 20 thou to get them to 60 because thats the minumum i would run. $300 bucks for springs seems cheap to me in comparison to a fuc*ked block, pistons and head
MAGN1T wrote:The manufacturers actually know what they're doing when they fit the factory springs.
Excessive seat load causes increased wear in the valvetrain.
Has anyone looked into part numbers and specs for N/A versus turbo springs for the same motor?
Steve
rollaholic wrote:MAGN1T wrote:The manufacturers actually know what they're doing when they fit the factory springs.
Excessive seat load causes increased wear in the valvetrain.
Has anyone looked into part numbers and specs for N/A versus turbo springs for the same motor?
Steve
no doubt they do. they were never intending for the heads to be pushing 200kw + though were they, or any amount of boost. (20vs that is)
you must admit that pretty much any mechanical component has its limits, why is it so hard for you to accept that valve springs ideally need to be upgraded past a certain point?
rollaholic wrote:bazda for example certainly sounds like he found the limits of stock valve springs on his head.
MAGN1T wrote:You don't seriously think that valve float caused one and only one valve to bend.
More likely bad workmanship.
I've never had a problem upgrading parts so long as the theory behind it makes sense, the boost thing certainly doesn't.
fivebob wrote:the required seat pressure to move the valve has been reduced, therefore the valve will accelerate faster and you will then get more valve loft.
The higher you rev the engine the greater the valve loft. Which at some point in time will result in valves meeting pistons and the inevitable bent valve.
MAGN1T wrote:rollaholic wrote:bazda for example certainly sounds like he found the limits of stock valve springs on his head.
You don't seriously think that valve float caused one and only one valve to bend.
More likely bad workmanship.
MAGN1T wrote:As soon as the valve is off it's seat, the pressure across it begins to equalise.
When it's fully open, the pressure across it is at it's least and spring load is at it's greatest so boost has negligible effect.
Obvious?
rollaholic wrote:how do you propose that bad workmanship caused one and only one valve to bend, since the spring itself clearly cant be at fault?
.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests