by Adamal » Tue Jan 20, 2009 1:28 am
So, 2 fairly new cars on the horizon. The 370Z due probably some time this year, and the IS-F due out sometime in the next, I don't know, few minutes or something.
I was just attending to some, *ahem* 'business' and was reading Top Gear mag. They just so happened to have a mini feature on each car, on opposing pages.
I was wondering which one I would choose.
They're both really good looking cars to me. The IS250 was a car that grabbed my attention, and the IS-F is much of the same. Despite it having a bulge in the bonnet which resembles an uncontrolled pre-pubecent 'woody'.
The 370Z on the other hand looks like its digging its fingers in its roots. A profile view of the car sees things shifted back, giving an aparent long nose, much like that of its originator, the 240Z. It manages this while still retaining a similar look to the current 350Z. The headlights though... People will either love them or hate them. Either way, I can see them being too 'complex' to be affordable to manufacture.
Under the hood, the IS has the guts with 300kw on tap, yet the Z will aparently make an admirable 246kw. What gets me though is more the gearboxes.
The IS is a tiptronic/auto only with 8 forward cogs. Remember the days when 4 was sufficient and 5 was a luxury? Sheesh!
Now we all know these column mounted shifters are on top of the game. Switching from one gear to another in a fraction of a second, giving ultimate response for the greatest driving pleasure! I'm sure you've heard all the hype before. It's something I can appreciate, and I know it makes for some quicker lap times, but for me, letting a computer take over for something I'd normally do takes away from pure driving pleasure.
Thats what makes it difficult for me to decide between the two. The Nissan comes with a 6 speed clutch-pedal operating gearbox which requires user intervention in the form of a left leg pressing in said clutch pedal! No computers here! Or is there? It is said that there will be a device in the Z which detects the user intervention, in combination with the user shifting the aptly named 'gear stick' into a position which results with a lower gear being used, and it automatically 'blips' the engine to match the revs with the appropriate selected gear!
This still leaves me in 2 minds then. From what I've read, that will be optional in the 'Sports' package, and lets hope it is. However, lets say that hypothetically, it isn't optional and you're stuck with it like herpes.
Everywhere I drive, I drive like I'm racing. Well within legal boundries, but still its a legal race. I can't help but come up to a red light, start braking, change down, shift my heel over to the throttle and give it a blip! There isn't a feeling quite as satisfying as pulling off a successful downchange blip! The time it took to get it right, to get a feel for the revs and the gearing. The mistakes made, the pity taken on the poor clutch, who tollerated my over and under revving.
Now the sense of acheivement is to be taken away by a computer. To think some average schmuck off the street can now hop in one and get it right thanks to the aid of a computer while they shout "Look at me! I'm just like a race driver! Wheee!" is like a crushing blow to all enthusiest like us.
But, such is the way with technology. It'll just be the next thing like traction control, ABS and all the rest that go with it.
Theres not really that much more info out there yet on the Z, so it'd be hard to say which one I would choose.
If I wanted to go fast, as in really fast, I'd probably choose the IS. Flappy paddles prevail. More of a driver experience probably belongs to the Z. Despite its self blipper, that is.
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.