4AGE Tuning

The place for all technical car discussions. If you haven't already, read our Disclaimer first!

Moderator: The Mod Squad

4AGE Tuning

Postby Vita » Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:25 pm

I've ferreted through a lot of threads but can't quite find information on what I'm looking for.

Basically I may be coming into having a 92 FX-GT silver top.
What I'm looking to do is to get it running efficiently instead of the base maps that may not quite be right for the age and rebuilt bits.

What is the recommended tuning piggyback ECU, or hand held for these?

Do they have a wideband o2 sensor or will a LC-1 be needed?

Can someone point me in the right direction?
Vita
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:36 pm

Postby AceSniper » Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:32 pm

they have narrow band
User avatar
AceSniper
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2002
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 10:55 am
Location: Hamilton

Postby ChaosAD » Wed Apr 08, 2009 9:36 pm

If your the planning on doing everything yourself and dont mind doing a bit of reading then the megasquirt ecu is a good option.

The fx has a 4 wire narowband so an lc1 or lm2 would be a good idea.

If you want to take it into a dyno to get it tuned then go with what the dyno operator is familiar with. Alternatively the new links sound like a good unit.

I wouldnt piss around with a piggyback. They have limited adjustability and mess with the tinimg.
An emanage ultimate piggyback is a similar price to a link.
User avatar
ChaosAD
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2212
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:40 am
Location: Whangarei

Postby Vita » Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:02 pm

well.. there is a LOT of reading on that megasquirt!

I've read conflicting information on the SAFC units but couldn't find a pros/cons list on them. From what I understand though this is the sort of thing I want to be able to do - basic adjustment on the already existing ecu map - although I don't want the timing issue.
hmm, tell me if I'm going off on a wild tangent that is a waste of time
Vita
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:36 pm

Postby tsoob » Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:48 am

+1 LINK
Platinum Wheels
15 Parkway Drive
Mairangi Bay
09 486 5317
WHEELS, TYRES & SUSPENSION!
www.platinumwheels.co.nz
User avatar
tsoob
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3253
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 7:37 pm
Location: 201.1kw on 19psi

Postby ROBODISCO_20v » Thu Apr 09, 2009 4:06 pm

Vita wrote:I've read conflicting information on the SAFC units but couldn't find a pros/cons list on them.
1st gen SAFC is rubbish. I was told by st hi-tec that they do weird things like cause random stalling etc. Apexi SAFCII & Neo are the go. Had a SAFCII on my black top with no problems at all & gave a nice power gain, especially at lower rpm where the 20v's need it.
One piece of advice, don't try tune it yourself. Get it dyno tuned by someone who knows what they're doing like st hi-tec.
Last edited by ROBODISCO_20v on Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
ROBODISCO_20v
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 599
Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: Manukau Toyota - Parts Dept

Postby MAGN1T » Thu Apr 09, 2009 5:32 pm

You only get timing issues with piggybacks if you're upsizing the injectors. That's because you're tricking the ECU into thinking the load is less than it really is. The timing error is proportional to the % that you're upsizing the injectors by.
Nor is there anything wrong with the 1st get AFC. They're an excellent method of fine tuning. Tuning is probably better done on the road rather than dyno. Nor is there anything wrong with NB sensors other than the fact that they have limited life and the one in your car, like all others is probably faulty.

It's not a bad idea to put the car on the dyno before you do anything to it. That way you'll get some numbers and an AFR plot for it.
Then after you've spent a few $KK on it, you can figure out how much each extra HP has cost you.

Steve
Computers make you go mad.
MAGN1T
!USER HAS BEEN BANNED!
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 11:34 pm

Postby Vita » Thu Apr 09, 2009 7:36 pm

MAGN1T wrote: NB sensors
Steve



^^ whats this? nb is to short for the search criteria



Awsome Mate, thank you, a starting point.
At this stage my mind is going towards a dyno run then a LC2 wideband and guage along with a SAFCII. Im leaving standard injectors. Im not after huge power or major tuning, just efficient power for what is available :) (we will rehash that idea in the future)
Vita
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:36 pm

Postby Bling » Thu Apr 09, 2009 8:19 pm

User avatar
Bling
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 15990
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Quake City

Postby rollaholic » Thu Apr 09, 2009 8:49 pm

im pretty sure he used NB is an abbreviation for narrowband in that post

i sure wouldnt be taking anything magn1t says as gospel though
BASU!
User avatar
rollaholic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5383
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:19 am
Location: West is Best

Postby xsspeed » Thu Apr 09, 2009 10:11 pm

lol'd

YEah narrow band vs wide band I would assume
xsspeed
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3946
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby frost » Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:07 am

ROBODISCO_20v wrote:
Vita wrote:I've read conflicting information on the SAFC units but couldn't find a pros/cons list on them.
1st gen SAFC is rubbish. I was told by st hi-tec that they do weird things like cause random stalling etc. Apexi SAFCII & Neo are the go. Had a SAFCII on my black top with no problems at all & gave a nice power gain, especially at lower rpm where the 20v's need it.
One piece of advice, don't try tune it yourself. Get it dyno tuned by someone who knows what they're doing like st hi-tec.


i was also told that there only good on 16v 4age engines but the blacktop is too smart for its own good.

interesting to hear about results with blacktops using piggybacks.
i was told that the blacktop ecu is fuzzy logic and over time would revert the settings done by the safc2 and neo to normal factory settings.
as dyno plots on club4ag showed that after a month or so it went back to factory settings and power.

things i found out the hard way was the igniters in blacktops have internal dwell control/or self dwell control.
anyone elso have input would be good as i got a apexi neo for cheap but reluctant to use it if its just fuzzy.

also DON'T road tune it that's a stupid idea.
frost
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1705
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:19 pm

Postby Vita » Fri Apr 10, 2009 11:59 am

frost wrote:
ROBODISCO_20v wrote:
Vita wrote:I've read conflicting information on the SAFC units but couldn't find a pros/cons list on them.
1st gen SAFC is rubbish. I was told by st hi-tec that they do weird things like cause random stalling etc. Apexi SAFCII & Neo are the go. Had a SAFCII on my black top with no problems at all & gave a nice power gain, especially at lower rpm where the 20v's need it.
One piece of advice, don't try tune it yourself. Get it dyno tuned by someone who knows what they're doing like st hi-tec.


i was also told that there only good on 16v 4age engines but the blacktop is too smart for its own good.

interesting to hear about results with blacktops using piggybacks.
i was told that the blacktop ecu is fuzzy logic and over time would revert the settings done by the safc2 and neo to normal factory settings.
as dyno plots on club4ag showed that after a month or so it went back to factory settings and power.

things i found out the hard way was the igniters in blacktops have internal dwell control/or self dwell control.
anyone elso have input would be good as i got a apexi neo for cheap but reluctant to use it if its just fuzzy.

also DON'T road tune it that's a stupid idea.


With the blacktop been a MAP sensor and the silver been MAF - will that info on the ECU reverting back to orginal settings be an issue with a silvertop?
Vita
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:36 pm

Postby sergei » Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:14 pm

Vita wrote:
frost wrote:
ROBODISCO_20v wrote:
Vita wrote:I've read conflicting information on the SAFC units but couldn't find a pros/cons list on them.
1st gen SAFC is rubbish. I was told by st hi-tec that they do weird things like cause random stalling etc. Apexi SAFCII & Neo are the go. Had a SAFCII on my black top with no problems at all & gave a nice power gain, especially at lower rpm where the 20v's need it.
One piece of advice, don't try tune it yourself. Get it dyno tuned by someone who knows what they're doing like st hi-tec.


i was also told that there only good on 16v 4age engines but the blacktop is too smart for its own good.

interesting to hear about results with blacktops using piggybacks.
i was told that the blacktop ecu is fuzzy logic and over time would revert the settings done by the safc2 and neo to normal factory settings.
as dyno plots on club4ag showed that after a month or so it went back to factory settings and power.

things i found out the hard way was the igniters in blacktops have internal dwell control/or self dwell control.
anyone elso have input would be good as i got a apexi neo for cheap but reluctant to use it if its just fuzzy.

also DON'T road tune it that's a stupid idea.


With the blacktop been a MAP sensor and the silver been MAF - will that info on the ECU reverting back to orginal settings be an issue with a silvertop?


I can say, yes. I had SAFC on mine and only thing it did is make it worse.
I also noticed by monitoring VF it happily reverted itself to factory after a while, if Oxygen sensor is functioning. Or if you do change certain things over certain threshold it would run in semi-limp mode (VF=0V), which equals too rich and no advance. The oxygen sensor affects the full throttle operation, even if it is open loop mode, in long term. When ECU is reset it will start rapidly learning from O2 sensor what fuel trim it supposed to run, and it set long term fuel trim. Also it constantly adjust long term fuel trim to compensate for sensor calibration. Thus adjusting the spring on AFM (or intercepting the signal) will only affect the transients on long term while base line will stay more or less the same.
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby Vita » Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:25 pm

Sorry for my ignorance VF=?

I may be wrong in this assumption but would haveing the wideband LC2 02 sensor change the way that the setup would work?
Vita
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:36 pm

Postby sergei » Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:33 pm

VF= is diagnostic output of fuel trim state,
0V usually means compensating lean condition (ECU registers that engine runs lean, computer tries to compensate other way)
1.25
2.5 - normal, no compensation
3.75
5V compensating rich condition (ECU registers that engine runs rich, computer tries to compensate other way)
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby Vita » Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:41 pm

ok - tutoring the idiot here :)
A SAFC or simila is controlling the voltage to VF to adjust the fuel trim?
Vita
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:36 pm

Postby frost » Fri Apr 10, 2009 10:44 pm

bugger i was hoping it was not true. thanks Sergei for the good info
+rep to you.

Sergei i just saw you have your mines silver top ecu for sale.
was you assessment described above while running the mines ecu?
frost
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1705
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:19 pm

Postby sergei » Sat Apr 11, 2009 9:59 am

frost wrote:bugger i was hoping it was not true. thanks Sergei for the good info
+rep to you.

Sergei i just saw you have your mines silver top ecu for sale.
was you assessment described above while running the mines ecu?


Both.
Mines ECU has got a daughter board with extra CMOS chip on it as well as new uC. Theoratically it is possible to retune that ECU if you know how to "chip" ECUs.
Mines ECU is standard ecu modified by Mines to allow them swap chips etc.
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby MAGN1T » Sat Apr 11, 2009 10:30 am

sergei wrote:


I can say, yes. I had SAFC on mine and only thing it did is make it worse.
I also noticed by monitoring VF it happily reverted itself to factory after a while, if Oxygen sensor is functioning. Or if you do change certain things over certain threshold it would run in semi-limp mode (VF=0V), which equals too rich and no advance. The oxygen sensor affects the full throttle operation, even if it is open loop mode, in long term. When ECU is reset it will start rapidly learning from O2 sensor what fuel trim it supposed to run, and it set long term fuel trim. Also it constantly adjust long term fuel trim to compensate for sensor calibration. Thus adjusting the spring on AFM (or intercepting the signal) will only affect the transients on long term while base line will stay more or less the same.


So your oxy sensor was faulty and the correct fix would have been to replace it?

Steve
Computers make you go mad.
MAGN1T
!USER HAS BEEN BANNED!
 
Posts: 646
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2002 11:34 pm

Next

Return to Tech Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests