$4000 to spend.. but what to buy?

General discussions on all non technical car related topics

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby Timmo » Wed May 13, 2009 5:53 pm

kim0663 wrote:1uz is definately better than the 1jz


Nah disagree....the 1J Soarers I test drove before settling on mine all seemed more powerful, torquey and smoother than the V8 models I drove...and they use less gas (when new at least)

....but to the original poster- A Soarer is not what you want when you are a student. Apart from fuel costs, parts and insurance will bankrupt you....
Lightweight baby
1991 MX5 Supercharged
Timmo
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 707
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:44 am
Location: Tauranga/Mount

Postby Timmo » Thu May 14, 2009 11:10 am

(I replied to your PM but thought I may as well post for any future searches)

Hey mate- Yeah I have owned a Soarer (91 JZZ30 so it was the twin turbo version) as well as a NA MR2 and currently a turbo MR2

In terms of 'driving pleasure' the MR2 wins hands down- It is a more involved car- better steering and handling, better seats and a more 'snug' cockpit.

The Soarer is very different but still a great car.....it is superb for longer journeys and for cruising- lots of power, luxurious interior and a bit more space etc.

My non turbo MR2 never felt 'slow' but you did have to work the engine a bit harder compared to my turbo MR2 which you can just use the torque- There isn't much point going up to the redline as the compressor is a bit overwhelmed and the 3S aint no B16 in terms of reviness ;).

In terms of work costs on the MR2s- Labour is usually what becomes expensive because they can be hard to work on. The soarer is pretty easy to work on comparibly- everything is in easy reach but parts are probably more expensive (although I had a good run with mine- Just normal 5k oil changes etc). A 4G Soarer will probably need a lot of fixing up though....

So it depends what you want- I would suggest, in your situation, that a non turbo MR2 will still give you the thrills and use a bit less gass etc but check insurance because it WILL be expensive for any of these cars. If possible, the NZ new N/A Mr2s are the pick of the bunch if going for the early nineties ones as they have no power steering and probably a better service history (later ones are usually above 4g)
Lightweight baby
1991 MX5 Supercharged
Timmo
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 707
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:44 am
Location: Tauranga/Mount

Postby Mr.Phreak » Thu May 14, 2009 11:36 am

Timmo wrote:...and they use less gas (when new at least)
:lol: :lol:

Don't buy a Soarer if you're a student, it will destroy you
Image
User avatar
Mr.Phreak
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2700
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 6:10 pm
Location: Gisborne

.

Postby Willdat? » Fri May 15, 2009 1:07 pm

for $4k as a student I'd say keep your Ae101, or buy a newer Ae111.

At 17 you won't get insurance for anything quicker, you may not have had a crash yet...but it will happen sooner or later judging from your enthusiasm for speed and magz...
User avatar
Willdat?
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 10:07 am
Location: Nelson

Postby Mad Murphy » Fri May 15, 2009 5:03 pm

You've posted enough on the MR2 forums, just buy an MR2. SWs are dirt cheap, you'll pick one up for ~3 grand in good condition and have money left over to tidy all the small things up. Sure its not the fastest car in the world but it'll still be fun enough and good for daily commuting.
1989 Supercharged AW11, 1981 Sprinter GT, 1991 Primera s**tmobile.

Facelift AW11 Parts Wanted!
User avatar
Mad Murphy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1313
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 4:38 pm
Location: Rolleston

Postby Mr Revhead » Fri May 15, 2009 7:41 pm

this is true
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby FXGTV » Fri May 15, 2009 9:30 pm

And insurance on mr2's are not that bad. I got my turbo sw20 insured through state for 340 per year, and that was for full insurance! I was 21 at the time and had an accident on my record :roll: :lol:
1988 r31 TI Skyline.
1982 ra60 Celica (my Aussie Toyota and axle stand warrior).
ex: 1991 Corolla, 1989 fxgt-v, 1985 aw11. 1992 sw20 gt-s. 2002 glxi Lancer wagon (work hack)
next car - another a-dub please!
User avatar
FXGTV
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1703
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby B1NZ » Sat May 16, 2009 10:01 am

FXGTV wrote:And insurance on mr2's are not that bad. I got my turbo sw20 insured through state for 340 per year, and that was for full insurance! I was 21 at the time and had an accident on my record :roll: :lol:


its because they get a hairdressers discount :lol:
Subaru GF8 Wagon
Subaru GC8 rally car project
http://www.hccc.org.nz - Keep up to date with all motorsport events in the Wellington region
User avatar
B1NZ
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 6043
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 7:20 pm
Location: Capital City

Postby CelicaGT8 » Sat May 23, 2009 10:37 pm

GETA PERM
User avatar
CelicaGT8
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 797
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:50 am
Location: South Auckland

Postby CelicaGT8 » Sat May 23, 2009 10:39 pm

NAC give almost anyone insurance for anything
User avatar
CelicaGT8
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 797
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:50 am
Location: South Auckland

Postby Adamal » Sat May 23, 2009 11:03 pm

Timmo wrote: NZ new N/A Mr2s are the pick of the bunch if going for the early nineties ones as they have no power steering and probably a better service history (later ones are usually above 4g)


They also have a 260kph speedo :P

But they're hard to come by. $80,000 new for one of those? They only came N/A. Hardly think so :P
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
User avatar
Adamal
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 11592
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:01 pm
Location: Waitakere Drift Stage (Ranges)

Postby kim0663 » Sun May 24, 2009 8:52 am

I can definately say, that when ever i drive the soarer every now and then, my wallet becomes so light.

But i'd have to add that driving my sw20 is also, not the most economical vehicle in the world.

Shoulda just kept the ae101, but as you've already sold it...

Get a sw20 n/a. My old n/a was alot more economical than my ae101 s/s. (not alot, but a noticable difference). You'd be surprised at how well they go, They arn't something thats like hugely fast, but for a 2L n/a, they have torque.
Mr2 GT-S
330ci M
User avatar
kim0663
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 1:32 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby FXGTV » Sun May 24, 2009 10:42 am

Get a Honda :lol:
1988 r31 TI Skyline.
1982 ra60 Celica (my Aussie Toyota and axle stand warrior).
ex: 1991 Corolla, 1989 fxgt-v, 1985 aw11. 1992 sw20 gt-s. 2002 glxi Lancer wagon (work hack)
next car - another a-dub please!
User avatar
FXGTV
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1703
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby dnalunchie » Sun May 24, 2009 12:08 pm

FXGTV wrote:Get a Honda :lol:


not a silly idea actually. 4g will get you a nice 1990 sir or maybe a newer 1994 shape.

they go very well and use stuff all gas
EX:89 RS and GT Legacys, 90 EF9 Civic, 95 Integra R, 95 AE101, 90 ST185, 88 Accord, 87 3rdoor and 5door Swift hatch, 91 Pontiac Lemans, 80 Liftback Celica, 95 Hornet 250
Current: 90 3sfe Corona
User avatar
dnalunchie
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3393
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 12:07 am
Location: Christchurch

Postby snwtoy » Sun May 24, 2009 12:28 pm

Charade GTti... it's effectively a toyota. Quick, rare, and cheap on gas.
User avatar
snwtoy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5810
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby Leon » Sun May 24, 2009 1:24 pm

dnalunchie wrote:
FXGTV wrote:Get a Honda :lol:


not a silly idea actually. 4g will get you a nice 1990 sir or maybe a newer 1994 shape.

they go very well and use stuff all gas


Personally I reckon they're too much the same as the AE, but far more expensive to buy (and get parts for). Certainly not very different for somebody who just sold a 20 valve, and is looking at Soarers.

I've had an SiR Crx and Civic (1990). To be honest, I didn't like either of them, and both were a bloody nightmare to get parts for. They were no faster or more economical than a Corolla that cost way less.

However, each to their own, and I gather some people have had better experiences with their Honda's. However, in my experience, grossly over rated, and this is coming from somebody who has bought two of them.
User avatar
Leon
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 6642
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Wellington

Postby CelicaGT8 » Sun May 24, 2009 7:07 pm

FXGTV wrote:Get a Honda :lol:

Yea you could get your balls removed at the same time
User avatar
CelicaGT8
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 797
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:50 am
Location: South Auckland

Postby GTTpower » Sun May 24, 2009 7:15 pm

CelicaGT8 wrote:
FXGTV wrote:Get a Honda :lol:

Yea you could get your balls removed at the same time


Nothing wrong with hondas, they have better n/a engines than toyota imo.
1999 SXE10 Altezza RS200Z
2004 Honda SCV100
Previous: 1993 EP85 Starlet, 1984 KP60 Starlet
Steam/Origin ID: nzEP85
User avatar
GTTpower
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 8:47 am
Location: Hamilton

Postby Bling » Sun May 24, 2009 7:19 pm

They are still hondas though :lol:
User avatar
Bling
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 15990
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Quake City

Postby GTTpower » Sun May 24, 2009 7:33 pm

Meh, one eyedness ftl
1999 SXE10 Altezza RS200Z
2004 Honda SCV100
Previous: 1993 EP85 Starlet, 1984 KP60 Starlet
Steam/Origin ID: nzEP85
User avatar
GTTpower
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 8:47 am
Location: Hamilton

PreviousNext

Return to General Car Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests