FFS. You go about trying to do things the correct way (I'm in the middle of a letter to Nathan Guy - our local MP - to represent my views on the matter) and these dickheads do this!
Having said that though what evidence has been provided that they were infact boy racers. Where does it say that they were:
A: Racing
B: 100% Male
C: Young
They have been called boy racers because that is what the media wants to call it. I understand that the police have reported that the lady who was attacked apparently called them boy racers but do you really think she got enough evidence behind her to actually call them that?
I know this is going to sound odd but, has there been any other news regarding this? I don't know CHCH at all. But, is it possible that this story is made up? The facts that make me suspicious are:
The timing of the article, released just after a new bill has been introduced into parliament, there is no time frame given on the article (could've happened in 2005 for all we know.)
Quite a few is stated as the first quantity, then approx 100 boy racers.
A female security guard, if this is a made up story then a female is going to get more of the public on the media's side due to chivalry etc.
It all seems a bit too well fashioned. If it happened on the weekend why has the information been held by the media until today? If it happened last night, how many times have you seen "Boy Racers" congregate on a Thursday night? Friday and Saturday maybe. And "approximately 100 vehicles"? I'd like to hear more from the novelist, sorry Journalist who wrote this story.
Brute force and ignorance always prevails.
Failure comes from too little brute force, or too little ignorance.