by mjrstar » Thu Oct 29, 2009 2:08 pm
sounds to me that option 1 is right:
an opposed piston caliper will not need as much fluid displacement as a sliding caliper of the same piston diameter. as the pads only have to move 1/2 the distance back to the disc. I had a lengthy thread on another forum with a member on this very subject. I was more looking at master cylinder sizes vs pedal effort..
here is a snippet.
Matt:
A single piston sliding caliper with a 1 inch bore piston will use the same fluid as a twin pot caliper with opposing pistons the same size? It will use half the fluid of a twin piston sliding caliper with pistons the same size. The twin piston sliding caliper with 1 inch bore pistons will use the same fluid as a 4 piston fixed caliper with the same size pistons. This is because on a sliding caliper the the piston must travel twice the distance as it accounts for the travel of the pads on both sides if the disc, so a single piston caliper will travel 2mm to take up a 1mm "gap" on each side of the disc but for a twin piston fixed caliper each piston only moves 1mm?
When I say bore i'm talking total piston area, sure we all went to school for a bit but how much attention during maths, it wasn't all that exciting.
I think I have missed something here...
and the reply:
You are right about the comparison between sliding calipers and opposed-piston calipers.
When comparing effective areas (piston bores), the sliding caliper's total piston area is compared to ONE SIDE of the opposed piston caliper, not all of them.
The difference in knock-off succeptibility between the two types has more to do with the fact that the opposed caliper is fixed than the number of pistons, although this does increase it even more.
For those that don't know what pad knock-off is:
When cornering hard there is always some flex in the wheel bearings, this causes the brake disks to deflect a bit. (since they are clamped to the wheel)
This deflection causes the brake pads to be pushed back, thereby pushing the pistons back into their bores a bit.
The next time you jump on the pedal, the hard point is lower than normal since the master cylinder has to push the pistons back out.
(This is pretty much the only time that 'fluid volume' comes into the equation, all the rest is pressure, force, and areas)
Sliding calipers are largely immune to knock-off since they just slide with the disk deflection.
A sliding caliper with a 1" piston vs a 2-pot opposed caliper with 1" pistons will require the same pedal effort to achieve a given braking force. (All else being equal of course)
Lith might know which forum this from...
In the end i just gutted the preportioning valve internals and it's given me a pretty good balance, although a tiny bit too much rear end bias if the brakes are cold.
I also installed a large master cylinder, 1'' up from 3/4''
current cars:
Evo 4 230Kw atw
1971 mini.
79 bugeye 245kw atw.
Evo powered mx5 under construction
'not putting pictures in my signature since 2009'