"Intercooler Tubes"

General discussions on all non technical car related topics

Moderator: The Mod Squad

"Intercooler Tubes"

Postby ee904age » Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:29 pm

This may have been posted before, but does anyone have any experience with these?

Any Pros/Cons?

Seem like a great idea in theory for the likes of MR2's bt possibly a big airflow restriction?
90 SW20 Turbo - Project
90 SW20 N/A - Sold
User avatar
ee904age
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1388
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 6:27 pm
Location: Wanganui

Postby cogent » Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:32 pm

it's just a compact water to air IC, isnt it?
cogent
 

Postby sergei » Thu Mar 18, 2010 7:37 pm

Sounds like scam to me.

Not enough of volume water flows to take all the heat away.
Simple physics as a matter of fact. Even discarding the low efficiency of fins, and added drag. There is not even enough surface for heat transfer to water jacket. Unless you are spraying it with liquid nitrogen I don't see how it would work at all.
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby Akane » Thu Mar 18, 2010 8:58 pm

Looks like it works, and you can have a lot of them to replace your normal pipes, might work friggin awesome on something with very little room, like the MR2
No "stance", no "hellaflush", none of that bullshit. Nothing but no grip on full boost.
http://www.lol.co.nz/ random shit.
User avatar
Akane
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4073
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 2:08 am
Location: Auckland

Postby matt dunn » Thu Mar 18, 2010 10:37 pm

we have a large one for the MRS we are building.

I believe they will work, and data logging and inlet temp sensors will prove it either way.
Water cools a lot better than air,
7AGTE - DX20VT - viewtopic.php?t=59733
Discussion - viewtopic.php?t=59751
matt dunn
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 7109
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 1:01 am
Location: Timaru

Postby Stott69 » Sat Mar 20, 2010 11:55 am

Could hook it up via the air con with a temp sensor, when you see the gauge rise hit air con and blast it on full chill. shame the air con will drain all the power your gaining tho
Image jzs147 Aristo money pit
User avatar
Stott69
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2605
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:51 am
Location: Wainui Central!

Postby Boosted_162 » Sat Mar 20, 2010 2:18 pm

matt dunn wrote:we have a large one for the MRS we are building.

I believe they will work, and data logging and inlet temp sensors will prove it either way.
Water cools a lot better than air,


Very keen to hear your results when its running :D
Current:
1996 KZN185 Hilux Surf
2008 Mazda2
Boosted_162
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3624
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 1:02 am
Location: Kaukapakapa

Postby wishihadaTE27 » Sat Mar 20, 2010 6:36 pm

water has a heat capacity something like 4 times better than air - so its definitely possible.
User avatar
wishihadaTE27
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:29 pm

Postby mr_monkey » Sat Mar 20, 2010 9:22 pm

the tubes are very very very expensive compared to other water 2 air intercoolers on the market.
Previous rides: 1992 Toyota Trueno, 1992 Nissan GTI-R, 1985 Toyota AW11, 1990 Toyota SW20 Turbo, 1994 Toyota Supra Twin turbo, 1991 Toyota Soarer Turbo, 1991 nissan Safari
Cogent wrote: there is a fraudulent cogent-post in your sig and i insist that you cease displaying it immediately or else i'll track you down and perform acts of homosexuality on your face
mr_monkey
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 756
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 4:08 pm
Location: Hamilton

Postby sergei » Sat Mar 20, 2010 11:49 pm

Has any one considered amount of energy needed to dissipate vs surface area and water volume?

There is a reason why intercoolers are bulky, even W/A ones that are generally smaller still, have huge surface area where water indirectly contacts the air flow.

That ring, even if you put 10 of them, hasn't got enough surface area to allow efficient heat transfer. The fins do not have capacity to conduct heat either. They are long and thin.

I can bring calculations into this... but I am too lazy.

Here is the basic break down:
Water heat capacity is ~4.2 kj/ kg K
In other words it means that 4.2kJ needed to raise temperature of 1kg (1L) of water by 1K (1'C).

Now lets assume following things: guestimate % of heat lost through turbo is ~10% of the power. So if 200kW engine 20kW is heat created by turbo.
20kW is 20kJ per second.
I assume the following: temperature drop is 30'C (before intercooler is 80'C, after is 50'C).

so we have the following numbers:

4.2 kJ / kg K
30K
20kJ / s

We can calculate water flow needed to soak that heat.
20kW / (30K * 4.2 kJ / kg K) = 0.159 kg / s (or ~9L/min).

That is all good and dandy, until you start calculating the capacity of certain area to conduct heat. What people expect is all of those 20kW go through that small area (~10sq cm). The smaller the surface the greater thermal resistance. Thermal resistance of that desing is huge.



Thermal conductivity of aluminium is: 237 W/ mK
The thickness of that unit (eyeballing) is ~ 5mm. The area ~ 10sq cm
So:

237 W/ mK * 30K * 0.001sq m / 0.005m =1420 Watts.

This unit with those parameters (temp difference is 30K and dimensions eyeballed from picture, you are welcome to supply real dimensions), the unit can only dissipate 1.42 kWatts!. That number is irrelevant as the fins are not able to conduct that heat to the rings anyway (same reason - low thermal conductivity).


To improve my calculations one can measure real dimensions (I need surface area of the area covered by ring and thickness of the tube wall).
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby 20v_rollaboy » Sun Mar 21, 2010 12:40 am

My jetski comes with a tube type intercooler which is actually built into the intake manifold.

Image

One of the best mods to do to these is swap it out for an external w2a intercooler because of the surface area.
Image
User avatar
20v_rollaboy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1144
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:23 am
Location: East Auckland

Postby cat007 » Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:12 pm

20v_rollaboy wrote:My jetski comes with a tube type intercooler


wait wait wait wait wait waaaaaaaaait a minute

You own a turbo jetski? Is that normal? 8O
1:15.4 around Pukekohe
13.63 @ 169kmph at Meremere
Fastest MK3 at Suprafest 08
1G-GTE - Stinger 4424, T04B 60-1, 440cc injectors - 240rwkw @ 16psi
User avatar
cat007
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3577
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 7:29 pm

Postby Bling » Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:20 pm

Some come super charged factory, and they go quite well if I do say so :lol: So his is either supercharged, or he's slapped a turbo on it :lol: What mods have you done to get 74mph out of it? What they do normally, 65?
User avatar
Bling
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 15990
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Quake City

Postby 20v_rollaboy » Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:56 pm

Yes super-charged :D

Out of the box around 65 yes. Quite a bit done to mine, might start up a project thread if people are interested :?:
Image
User avatar
20v_rollaboy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1144
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 12:23 am
Location: East Auckland

Postby Bling » Sun Mar 21, 2010 11:02 pm

Do it!
User avatar
Bling
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 15990
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Quake City

Postby loudstealthGT-Four » Sun Mar 21, 2010 11:21 pm

BZG|Bling wrote:Do it!


+1
User avatar
loudstealthGT-Four
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 12:34 am
Location: Invercargill

Postby cat007 » Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:12 am

loudstealthGT-Four wrote:
BZG|Bling wrote:Do it!


+1


++1 :)
1:15.4 around Pukekohe
13.63 @ 169kmph at Meremere
Fastest MK3 at Suprafest 08
1G-GTE - Stinger 4424, T04B 60-1, 440cc injectors - 240rwkw @ 16psi
User avatar
cat007
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3577
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 7:29 pm

Postby sergei » Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:00 am

20v_rollaboy wrote:My jetski comes with a tube type intercooler which is actually built into the intake manifold.

Image

One of the best mods to do to these is swap it out for an external w2a intercooler because of the surface area.


This is very different to the tubes in question.
The water core is inside, and has much greater surface area and volume. Also if you look at the fittings, it supports much higher water flow.
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby Adamal » Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:06 am

20v_rollaboy wrote:Yes super-charged :D


Twin charge it! :D
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
User avatar
Adamal
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 11592
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:01 pm
Location: Waitakere Drift Stage (Ranges)


Return to General Car Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests