First Car to be crushed

Bling · Post by **Bling** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 7:00 pm

Well done haha!

tsoob · Post by **tsoob** » Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:11 pm

IMO $&#$% who got what he deserved.

GTsedan · Post by **GTsedan** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 6:58 am

It looks a bit rough.... been stripped of anything useful

http://www.odt.co.nz/your-town/milton/190566/milton-boy-racers-car-first-nz-be-crushed

I'm surprised no one has cracked out the Milton jokes yet...

Bling · Post by **Bling** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:12 am

Hmmm you kind of have to give him credit for doing skids in a car with no engine.

Grrrrrrr! · Post by **Grrrrrrr!** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:39 am

They need to give priority to these cases so the crushing order comes through while the car is still in police impound. Bit of a joke to crush a stripped shell while the owner gets to keep his engine, rims etc.

solitaire · Post by **solitaire** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 am

Yeah, he seems to have a an old lancer gsr now... so he still has not learned.

STR · Post by **STR** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:04 am

I'm surprised they didn't serve him a non-disposal order, and list the engine/box etc on there.

Land Transport (Enforcement Powers) Amendment Act 2009 No 36 wrote:98A Commissioner may prohibit sale or disposal of certain motor vehicles

“(1) This section applies if—

“(a) a person is charged with an offence under this Act or any other enactment that would, if the person is convicted of the offence, permit or require a court to order the confiscation of the person's motor vehicle under the Sentencing Act 2002; and

“(b) the Commissioner believes, on reasonable grounds in the circumstances, that the court would, if the person is convicted of the offence, order the confiscation of the person's motor vehicle under the Sentencing Act 2002.

“(2) If this section applies, the Commissioner may prohibit the sale or disposal of the motor vehicle by giving notice in the prescribed form to—

“(a) the person who is charged; and

“(b) the registered person of the motor vehicle (if a person other than the person who is charged).

“(3) A person notified under subsection (2) may not sell, or dispose of,—

“(a) the motor vehicle specified in the notice:

“(b) any parts of the motor vehicle specified in the notice.

FST4RD · Post by **FST4RD** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:05 am

http://www.facebook.com/#!/profile.php? ... 0498568776

thornz · Post by **thornz** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 9:11 am

GTsedan wrote:I'm surprised no one has cracked out the Milton jokes yet...

Nothing wrong with Milton, my wife is from there :lol:

GTTpower · Post by **GTTpower** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:10 am

FST4RD wrote:http://www.facebook.com/#!/profile.php?id=100000498568776

What a loser, roads a better place without him.

tsoob · Post by **tsoob** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:43 am

GTTpower wrote:
FST4RD wrote:http://www.facebook.com/#!/profile.php?id=100000498568776

What a loser, roads a better place without him.

Yeah his wall is unlocked...

Guys a typical flat peak wearing wigger who has no idea.

Alex B · Post by **Alex B** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:46 am

Although doing pretty well for someone from Milton, not Samantha Hayes good, but yeah. :lol:

Bazda · Post by **Bazda** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:34 pm

The reaction to this on the Nissan Silvia forum is totally opposite to this forum lol.

Bling · Post by **Bling** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 3:57 pm

...and that reaction summarised is?

NVM it's in the section you can view without being a member http://www.nissansilvia.co.nz/osiris/vi ... =1&t=60027

Summary is lots of crying about how someone caught doing skids 3 times in 4 years is being harshly treated. People reminiscing about how 10-15 years ago they could break the law by being a nuisance on the road but now it's unfair people get done for doing it.

tsoob · Post by **tsoob** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 4:05 pm

Bazda wrote:The reaction to this on the Nissan Silvia forum is totally opposite to this forum lol.

yeah paul posted on my facebook page as well..

Its just the way shit is life aint fair get over it.

The focus is on boy racers and thats that.

solitaire · Post by **solitaire** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 4:08 pm

Ha! nice tsoob jumped in to the silvia thread.

Yeah heaps of victum mentality of at the silvia forum... its pretty fecking simple, dont want you car crushed? dont do the number of offenses required to get your car crushed.

tsoob · Post by **tsoob** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 4:12 pm

solitaire wrote:Ha! nice tsoob jumped in to the silvia thread.

Yeah heaps of victum mentality of at the silvia forum... its pretty fecking simple, dont want you car crushed? dont do the number of offenses required to get your car crushed.

yeah thats the feel i got from their thread... oh its not fair were the victims..

How many silvia/mudline owners out there do this shit all the time...

'Oh we're not like them'

Yeah you choose to drive that car, your like them.

1I1 · Post by **1I1** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 4:54 pm

solitaire wrote:Yeah heaps of victum mentality of at the silvia forum... its pretty fecking simple, dont want you car crushed? dont do the number of offenses required to get your car crushed.

QFT

I mean FFS you have to be charged THREE times over two years.

This law has been put in place to directly target a stereotype. It's profiling, and borderline discrimination. Simply being of a certain age group, and owning a certain kind of car means that you are at risk of punishments far more severe than those dished out to people committing much worse crimes

Didn't stop the guy with a Merc? getting done under the boy racer law for doing a burnout despite pleading he wasn't a boy racer

Grrrrrrr! · Post by **Grrrrrrr!** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 5:01 pm

Three times over four years I think is the legal requirement to get your car crushed, but the hero that is the topic of this thread clocked up 3 in just over a year (sept '10 - sept '11). He was never going to make it.

So, does this mean that every time he gets caught doing 'skidz' from now on the car gets crushed, or does his count go back to zero and have to be worked up to three again?

DVSMOTORSPORT · Post by **DVSMOTORSPORT** » Tue Dec 13, 2011 5:21 pm

Impounding his car for doing skids, win

Issueing a warrant for the crushing of his car, fukn excellent

Letting him have his car back so he can take anything worth money and leaving a shell worth 50 bucks, biggest fukn mockery of the system Ive seen for a while :roll: