Supra vs. RX7
Moderator: The Mod Squad
Supra vs. RX7
Money is no object.....
altho i absolutely love supras and im not really a rotor fan...id say the rx7...seeing as money is no object , i wont mind breaking it
a frend of my has a S7 , and they go pretty damn nicely. the lighter nimbler car wuld be more fun to drive , seeing as theres not many place you culd use the supras brutul power anyway ...
- The Wombat
- Toyspeed Member
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:43 pm
- Location: Windy Wellington
prob should have been more specific in type of supra or rx7 as there are several shapes and engines for bith cars. but saying that i voted supra GOOOO OLD SKOOL CELICA SUPRA 5MGE
Current Rides: manual supercharged AW11, 1993 ford fiestiva *BOTH FOR SALE PM FOR DETAILS*
Previous Rides
1995 Rover 220 GTI
1989 Fiat Tipo 1400
1986 AW11 MR2 "written off 7/5/05"
1983 Toyota Levin AE86 20v,1990 Tureno GT APEX, R31 GTR skyline, VK holden, EA Falcon, 2x1980 Mazda 626
Previous Rides
1995 Rover 220 GTI
1989 Fiat Tipo 1400
1986 AW11 MR2 "written off 7/5/05"
1983 Toyota Levin AE86 20v,1990 Tureno GT APEX, R31 GTR skyline, VK holden, EA Falcon, 2x1980 Mazda 626
The Wombat wrote:prob should have been more specific in type of supra or rx7 as there are several shapes and engines for bith cars. but saying that i voted supra GOOOO OLD SKOOL CELICA SUPRA 5MGE
Which ever RX7 or Supra you'd get if money was no object for you
- The Wombat
- Toyspeed Member
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:43 pm
- Location: Windy Wellington
sweet as just a thought 
Current Rides: manual supercharged AW11, 1993 ford fiestiva *BOTH FOR SALE PM FOR DETAILS*
Previous Rides
1995 Rover 220 GTI
1989 Fiat Tipo 1400
1986 AW11 MR2 "written off 7/5/05"
1983 Toyota Levin AE86 20v,1990 Tureno GT APEX, R31 GTR skyline, VK holden, EA Falcon, 2x1980 Mazda 626
Previous Rides
1995 Rover 220 GTI
1989 Fiat Tipo 1400
1986 AW11 MR2 "written off 7/5/05"
1983 Toyota Levin AE86 20v,1990 Tureno GT APEX, R31 GTR skyline, VK holden, EA Falcon, 2x1980 Mazda 626
-
Looney_Head
- Toyspeed Member
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 2:05 pm
- Location: on here somewhere
- Contact:
- Dell'Orto
- ** Moderator **
- Posts: 17494
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 4:07 am
- Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt
FD for sure, I doubt a Supra could ever handle or stop as well as an RX-7.
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!
Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
Twolitre wrote:As Lith said, money is not an object and in that case I'd say an RX-7 however in reality the Supras reliabilty and the RX-7's lack of fuel economy would make the reverse decision for me.
And you're saying that a 3l twin turbo 6 pulling at least 500kg more would have good fuel economy?
If you revved a supra to 9krpm everyday you'd probably have reliability issues too.
RX-7 gets my thumbsup.
Dirty DA Duz 14.4's, 48's (Taupo) & 1:25's (Manfield)
Twolitre wrote:the Supras reliabilty and the RX-7's lack of fuel economy would make the reverse decision for me.
I guess I should add some seeing as this is my poll. I picked the RX7, though in real terms the Supra would be a more "sensible" option.
The RX7s are notorious for being bad on gas, compared to 4cylinders and NA 6s and 8s
FLAWLES wrote:dont now of fery many " if any " 1200hp plus rx7
but in saying that
can i do a 50/50 vote
cause the 7s abillity to " be one of the best balanced cars ever made " stop and go around cnrs like shiit stuck to a blanket 2nd to none
but with a few good mods the supra can to
There are over 1000hp RX7s running around, admittedly most of them running 20Bs - but 13Bs can pull that as well. You are selectively missing major points though, the RX7 doesn't need 1200hp to match a 1200hp Supra in power/weight - and lower inertia means that the RX7 can use that weight that little bit better, having an advantage launching (drag) and changing direction (track). An RX7 was one of the first 6s imports, afterall...
Also, you say with a few good mods the Supra can do the going around corners like shit stuck to a blanket etc - thats to overcome a natural advantage the RX7 has, the RX7 can ALSO be modified to further improve its handling.... anything you can do to one, can also be done to the other.
- Nathan Young
- Toyspeed Member
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 11:47 am
- Location: Te Puke
An RX7 was one of the first 6s imports, afterall...
are you meaning drag racing if so supra was first into 6s
rx7 second a few weeks later.
a mate of mine has got a s6 cost about $100 to come up and visit
cost me in my supra $50, both about same hp.
my choice would be a s7 with a supra motor in it
are you meaning drag racing if so supra was first into 6s
rx7 second a few weeks later.
a mate of mine has got a s6 cost about $100 to come up and visit
cost me in my supra $50, both about same hp.
my choice would be a s7 with a supra motor in it
88 celica st 162 3sgelu
94 supra 360rwkw
97 hiace regius van
90 corolla fx-zs
94 supra 360rwkw
97 hiace regius van
90 corolla fx-zs
A 300rwkw RX7 should be able to show a 300rwkw Supra its tail lights, and costing twice the fuel to get from one place to another implies there is more to the story. Either real bad tune, or an incredibly heavy foot!!
A Series 7 with a Supra motor? I can't really think about anything cool about that - it'd do HORRIBLE things to the nice balance an RX7 has. A 20B would be a much better upgrade.
A Series 7 with a Supra motor? I can't really think about anything cool about that - it'd do HORRIBLE things to the nice balance an RX7 has. A 20B would be a much better upgrade.
- Nathan Young
- Toyspeed Member
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2003 11:47 am
- Location: Te Puke
yeah will be a bit front heavy but i want reliable hp
and the lighter 7 makes good power to weight
and yeah my mate has a very heavy foot but still twice the fuel
and fuel cost about 98c L back then and i payed about $1.18 or
more was quite a while ago.
and the lighter 7 makes good power to weight
and yeah my mate has a very heavy foot but still twice the fuel
and fuel cost about 98c L back then and i payed about $1.18 or
more was quite a while ago.
88 celica st 162 3sgelu
94 supra 360rwkw
97 hiace regius van
90 corolla fx-zs
94 supra 360rwkw
97 hiace regius van
90 corolla fx-zs

