Mine is a 90 Non turbo, I get about ~400km out of ~40 litres
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
viking wrote:How easy are the MR2's to work on? engine wise, comes out the bottom or out the top?
lol they are a lot eaiser to work on then subies where you have to take out the mainfold just to replace sparks but it is a tight squeeze when working on the mr2
Bit of a shame they arent as efficiant as I thought they would be. Trying to work out what project car to do. Was thinking of turning a MR2 into a daily driver, but its just as economic as my current car. So in that case its either a MR2 turbo for a project car, or a M3 GTR.
I know in my car, I used to get from blenheim to christchurch on a little under half a tank, thats roughly 300k's? So maybe 550ish k's per tank?
Round town is obviously worse, as you're in lower gears, therefore on boost more
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting 1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons 2018 Ranger - Because workcar 1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time OMG so shiny!
I use 98 in my N/A. Doesn't give better power but engine runs smoother and has pretty much no pinking under load that it had on 96
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
Caldina's, Celica's and MR2's have the same 2.0L engine, 3SG(T)E.
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
viking wrote:How easy are the MR2's to work on? engine wise, comes out the bottom or out the top?
lol they are a lot eaiser to work on then subies where you have to take out the mainfold just to replace sparks but it is a tight squeeze when working on the mr2
wtf, who would take the intake manifold off a subie to do plugs