The theory of boost?

The place for all technical car discussions. If you haven't already, read our Disclaimer first!

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby GorGasm » Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:36 pm

The subbie sequential is a sack of shit. 4 psi at 4krpm and 13 psi at 7, coupled with a 8.5 CR and you get a pig.
GorGasm
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 93
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:16 pm

Postby Si » Mon Jan 23, 2006 8:44 pm

difference in the systems is AFAIK is the subbie uses two different sized turbos (vf8 and vf10?)

vs the supra and rx7 using same sized turbos but set up sequentialy......
Current: , '96 SubaruImpreza
Previous: '92 EE80 Corolla, '91 JZZ30 Soarer(The single snail whale), '91 AE92 FXGT(Silvertop 20v), '92 JZA70 MkIIISupra (The twin snail whale), '82 MkV Cortina.
User avatar
Si
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1304
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2004 10:19 pm
Location: Wellywood

Postby SUBARUCONVERT » Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:00 pm

The subaru uses a same sizied turbo setup, abilt with a silghtly differnt A/R on the exhuast housing. The older ones arnt that quick, but the GTB versions are. the power isnt smooth but i think people are strechin the story with no power from 4-5K and only 4psi boost. everyone i have driven the VOD lasts about 500 rpm. they make max torque at 5k so that really doesnt sound rite. They pull well all the way to 7.5 or 8k depending on model unlike some other TT's (cough VR-4)
SUBARUCONVERT
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: tauranga

Postby CozmoNz » Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:02 pm

Quite interesting when you see the setup without the engine in there :D, very cool..

wastegate.. no wastegate... what the hell!
Outta here on Dec 5th, 1630, WHOO HOO
Image
Rayne For President!
User avatar
CozmoNz
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5490
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Postby Dell'Orto » Mon Jan 23, 2006 9:44 pm

SUBARUCONVERT wrote:. the power isnt smooth but i think people are strechin the story with no power from 4-5K and only 4psi boost. everyone i have driven the VOD lasts about 500 rpm.


Nup, the one I drove (I'd just put a boost gauge into) dropped right back to 1-2psi at 4k, then jumped back up to 7 at 5...completely stock standard car though, with a decent intake and exhaust it might be better.
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby SUBARUCONVERT » Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:17 pm

sounds like theres somthing wrong with it, the boost shouldnt drop any lower than 5 psi during VOD, and once the second turbo is spooled boost should reach 10 psi or more regaurdless of model
SUBARUCONVERT
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: tauranga

Postby neon_spork » Mon Jan 23, 2006 11:56 pm

Time for an engineer to shed some light on the fluids side of things...

The mass flow rate will be the same at any point. kg/second

You are talking about volume flow rate (cfm) or in proper units, m^3/second. and Pressures (bar or psi) or in SI units kPa.

If you treat air as an idea gas (which should be pretty accurate) then the relationship is Pv = RT

P = pressure in kPa,
v = specific volume (Volume/Mass)
R = Gass constant for air
T = temperature in Kelvin

Volume flow rate is equal to the area x velocity (m^2 x m/s = m^3/s) Area of the inlet and velocity of the air can be measured.

Mass flow rate is equal to the volume flow rate x density (m^3/s x kg/m^3 = kg/s)
Inlet temperature can be measured, pressue at this point is known to be 1atmosphere or 101.3 kPa and from these density can be calculated or taken from a table.

specific volume = 1 over mass flow rate x volume flow rate (s/kg * m^3/s = m^3/kg)

So if you know ur volume flow rate and you mass flow rate at a point you can get the specifi volume (v). Then using the Idea gas equation you can find the pressure.

Pressure = R.T/v

R(gas constant) for air is 0.286 kJ/kg.K
T(temp in K) = deg C + 273

Hope that helps
User avatar
neon_spork
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:30 am

Postby Stealer Of Souls » Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:07 am

neon_spork wrote:Time for an engineer to shed some light on the fluids side of things...

The mass flow rate will be the same at any point. kg/second

You are talking about volume flow rate (cfm) or in proper units, m^3/second. and Pressures (bar or psi) or in SI units kPa.

If you treat air as an idea gas (which should be pretty accurate) then the relationship is Pv = RT

P = pressure in kPa,
v = specific volume (Volume/Mass)
R = Gass constant for air
T = temperature in Kelvin

Volume flow rate is equal to the area x velocity (m^2 x m/s = m^3/s) Area of the inlet and velocity of the air can be measured.

Mass flow rate is equal to the volume flow rate x density (m^3/s x kg/m^3 = kg/s)
Inlet temperature can be measured, pressue at this point is known to be 1atmosphere or 101.3 kPa and from these density can be calculated or taken from a table.

specific volume = 1 over mass flow rate x volume flow rate (s/kg * m^3/s = m^3/kg)

So if you know ur volume flow rate and you mass flow rate at a point you can get the specifi volume (v). Then using the Idea gas equation you can find the pressure.

Pressure = R.T/v

R(gas constant) for air is 0.286 kJ/kg.K
T(temp in K) = deg C + 273

Hope that helps

What happened to the n (number of mols) in the gas equation?

Anyways. Too much math. More general please.
I am an engineer. Just not a fluids person. It's all getting so technical.


fivebob wrote:No, it's not a linear relationship. Theorectically New Flow Rate = Old Flow Rate x the square root of (New Pressure divided by Old Pressure), but that may not be what happens in real life as the infernal combustion engine is a bit more complicated than the usual "pressure vs flow" model.

Okay cool. But my general thinking is correct. Complex physics aside. With roughly twice the flow (2x160CFM), I would end up with around about twice the pressure (2BAR absolute). Give or take a number of factors.


Pv=nrT
assuming v, r, and T are constant (of course they wouldn't be... but for arguments sake).
P doubles, n doubles.
yeah?
'86 AE85.5 Levin

I don't claim to know everything... That doesn't mean it isn't true....

Click here to see "My Black Hole"
Stealer Of Souls
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 10:42 pm
Location: West Auckland

Postby Ako » Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:59 am

SUBARUCONVERT wrote:The subaru uses a same sizied turbo setup, abilt with a silghtly differnt A/R on the exhuast housing. The older ones arnt that quick, but the GTB versions are. the power isnt smooth but i think people are strechin the story with no power from 4-5K and only 4psi boost. everyone i have driven the VOD lasts about 500 rpm. they make max torque at 5k so that really doesnt sound rite. They pull well all the way to 7.5 or 8k depending on model unlike some other TT's (cough VR-4)




I love debunking this particular argument.

My TT VR4's all made power up to the 8200 limiter, with f-all of the boost a subby needed to make the same. The TT subbys have a reputation for being awesome at overtaking - the reason for that is the fact they suck at everything else, so the owners all push the one thing the cars good at :lol:


Simultaneous = win :D
User avatar
Ako
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 12:51 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Postby fivebob » Tue Jan 24, 2006 10:11 am

Stealer Of Souls wrote:
neon_spork wrote:If you treat air as an idea gas (which should be pretty accurate) then the relationship is Pv = RT

P = pressure in kPa,
v = specific volume (Volume/Mass)
R = Gass constant for air
T = temperature in Kelvin

What happened to the n (number of mols) in the gas equation?

I think you will find that it's taken into account by using the specific volume which appears to be calculated as Volume/Mass, but I'm not an Engineer and the wording above is somewhat confusing to my poor wee uneducated mind :?
fivebob wrote:No, it's not a linear relationship. Theorectically New Flow Rate = Old Flow Rate x the square root of (New Pressure divided by Old Pressure), but that may not be what happens in real life as the infernal combustion engine is a bit more complicated than the usual "pressure vs flow" model.

Okay cool. But my general thinking is correct. Complex physics aside. With roughly twice the flow (2x160CFM), I would end up with around about twice the pressure (2BAR absolute). Give or take a number of factors.


Pv=nrT
assuming v, r, and T are constant (of course they wouldn't be... but for arguments sake).
P doubles, n doubles.
yeah?

No, from the equation I gave you need 4 times the flow for double the pressure, double pressure would only give 1.4 times the flow.
User avatar
fivebob
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3879
Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 5:12 pm
Location: Tauranga

Postby CozmoNz » Tue Jan 24, 2006 2:06 pm

Ako wrote:
SUBARUCONVERT wrote:The subaru uses a same sizied turbo setup, abilt with a silghtly differnt A/R on the exhuast housing. The older ones arnt that quick, but the GTB versions are. the power isnt smooth but i think people are strechin the story with no power from 4-5K and only 4psi boost. everyone i have driven the VOD lasts about 500 rpm. they make max torque at 5k so that really doesnt sound rite. They pull well all the way to 7.5 or 8k depending on model unlike some other TT's (cough VR-4)




I love debunking this particular argument.

My TT VR4's all made power up to the 8200 limiter, with f-all of the boost a subby needed to make the same. The TT subbys have a reputation for being awesome at overtaking - the reason for that is the fact they suck at everything else, so the owners all push the one thing the cars good at :lol:


Simultaneous = win :D


they have said it alot in this thread, its not pressure, its flow thats important...

what, 20psi on a ct9 is the same as 20psi on a ct20b? no.... excactly :P
Outta here on Dec 5th, 1630, WHOO HOO
Image
Rayne For President!
User avatar
CozmoNz
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5490
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Postby Punter » Tue Jan 24, 2006 2:29 pm

CozmoNz wrote:they have said it alot in this thread, its not pressure, its flow thats important...

what, 20psi on a ct9 is the same as 20psi on a ct20b? no.... excactly :P


If you assume that the charge temp is the same, and its on the same motor with no other changes. Then yes thats exactally the same.

Although i'm sure in real life the exhaust housing on a ct9 would choke it up.
User avatar
Punter
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Akl CBD

Postby Ako » Tue Jan 24, 2006 2:30 pm

Cozmo what are you on about?
User avatar
Ako
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 776
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 12:51 pm
Location: Elsewhere

Postby fivebob » Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:41 pm

Punter wrote:
CozmoNz wrote:they have said it alot in this thread, its not pressure, its flow thats important...

what, 20psi on a ct9 is the same as 20psi on a ct20b? no.... excactly :P


If you assume that the charge temp is the same, and its on the same motor with no other changes. Then yes thats exactally the same.

No it's not. The CT-9 will have more restriction in the turbine so the flow will be less. How many times do I have to say it;
Boost pressure is caused by restriction in the system, flow makes the HP, not boost :roll:

Although i'm sure in real life the exhaust housing on a ct9 would choke it up.

If you knew that then why contradict yourself by saying they are the same. :?
User avatar
fivebob
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3879
Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 5:12 pm
Location: Tauranga

Postby fivebob » Tue Jan 24, 2006 5:42 pm

Ako wrote:Cozmo what are you on about?

For once Cozmo is making sense and the rest of you are missing this momentous event :lol: :lol:
User avatar
fivebob
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3879
Joined: Fri May 02, 2003 5:12 pm
Location: Tauranga

Postby Punter » Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:34 pm

fivebob wrote:
Punter wrote:
CozmoNz wrote:they have said it alot in this thread, its not pressure, its flow thats important...

what, 20psi on a ct9 is the same as 20psi on a ct20b? no.... excactly :P


If you assume that the charge temp is the same, and its on the same motor with no other changes. Then yes thats exactally the same.

No it's not. The CT-9 will have more restriction in the turbine so the flow will be less. How many times do I have to say it;
Boost pressure is caused by restriction in the system, flow makes the HP, not boost :roll:

Although i'm sure in real life the exhaust housing on a ct9 would choke it up.

If you knew that then why contradict yourself by saying they are the same. :?


Yea sorry that was badly worded , you now what i mean :lol:
Last edited by Punter on Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:26 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Punter
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 809
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:02 pm
Location: Akl CBD

Postby CozmoNz » Tue Jan 24, 2006 8:55 pm

fivebob wrote:
Ako wrote:Cozmo what are you on about?

For once Cozmo is making sense and the rest of you are missing this momentous event :lol: :lol:


quoted, notepadded, and saved, this is a rare event.
Outta here on Dec 5th, 1630, WHOO HOO
Image
Rayne For President!
User avatar
CozmoNz
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5490
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Postby neon_spork » Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:41 am

fivebob wrote:
Stealer Of Souls wrote:
neon_spork wrote:If you treat air as an idea gas (which should be pretty accurate) then the relationship is Pv = RT

P = pressure in kPa,
v = specific volume (Volume/Mass)
R = Gass constant for air
T = temperature in Kelvin

What happened to the n (number of mols) in the gas equation?

I think you will find that it's taken into account by using the specific volume which appears to be calculated as Volume/Mass, but I'm not an Engineer and the wording above is somewhat confusing to my poor wee uneducated mind :?


Yeah your right, The equation P.V = n.Ru.T when V is volume and n is number of mols and Ru is the universal gas constant goes to P.v = R.T when you substitute specific volume v and the gas constant for a certain gas R.
User avatar
neon_spork
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2004 12:30 am

Postby Stealer Of Souls » Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:34 am

neon_spork wrote:Yeah your right, The equation P.V = n.Ru.T when V is volume and n is number of mols and Ru is the universal gas constant goes to P.v = R.T when you substitute specific volume v and the gas constant for a certain gas R.

Are we okay to assume that V does not change in this instance?
'86 AE85.5 Levin

I don't claim to know everything... That doesn't mean it isn't true....

Click here to see "My Black Hole"
Stealer Of Souls
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2054
Joined: Mon May 20, 2002 10:42 pm
Location: West Auckland

Postby SUBARUCONVERT » Wed Jan 25, 2006 6:47 pm

Ako wrote:
SUBARUCONVERT wrote:The subaru uses a same sizied turbo setup, abilt with a silghtly differnt A/R on the exhuast housing. The older ones arnt that quick, but the GTB versions are. the power isnt smooth but i think people are strechin the story with no power from 4-5K and only 4psi boost. everyone i have driven the VOD lasts about 500 rpm. they make max torque at 5k so that really doesnt sound rite. They pull well all the way to 7.5 or 8k depending on model unlike some other TT's (cough VR-4)




I love debunking this particular argument.

My TT VR4's all made power up to the 8200 limiter, with f-all of the boost a subby needed to make the same. The TT subbys have a reputation for being awesome at overtaking - the reason for that is the fact they suck at everything else, so the owners all push the one thing the cars good at :lol:


Simultaneous = win :D


I guess its what u define as "power". My work mate that i car pool with has a 2.5 TT manual VR4 galant, it has a nice wide power band but to me dies above 5.5k, its not standard ethier.
SUBARUCONVERT
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 6:44 pm
Location: tauranga

PreviousNext

Return to Tech Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests