CircuitLevin wrote:RedMist wrote:chch34 wrote:What makes a good tuner? Whats the reason you would/do recommend a tuner?
A tuner that gets big power?
A tuner that does a tune giving you car slightly less power but very reliable?
A tuner thats tuned lots of big HP cars that belong to rich people?
A tuner that has done lots of cars like ours?
A tuner that everyone else says is good, so he must be?
A tuner that noone says anything bad about?
What makes you people pick one tune shop over another? Everyone seems to take sides when it cones to recommending someone, why?
What makes you believe that optimal power isn't reliable?
Brett tuned my Bunderson well (4age, offroader). However didnt get row one quite correct on overrun (which is very hard to do on a dyno). I was very happy with the way the car ran other than it flooded on overrun. Which Brett could have easily corrected given a chance.
After a rebuild and considerably more headwork I took it to Richard at DCH. The guy did a fantastic job, and I seriously couldnt recommend higher. The car ran perfectly, which isnt easy for a simple LEM 4, with no holes, no overrun issues, no accl issues and a bump to 177.5 bhp at the wheels.
Nick at NZEFI, although I have thrown little work thier way (look out for the rally lancer soonish) would certainly work with. I've spoken with him on many occasions and think that Nick and his team could produce both an install and map worthy of an investment.
chch34 didnt say optimal, he said big power. By definition the optimal "should" be a balance of many things. There is a fuel cut on over run check box in the software
Isn't optimal the most favourable or desireable result? It is in the Oxford dictionary. I simply meant a so called Wet tune can be more unreliable than one "on the edge".
Fuel cut on overrun, ummm not on the LEM 4. Perhaps, Brett (CCC), Gary (PAD), Gary (WAR), Richard (DCH) and I all missed that box.