new FWD drag racing rule.

General discussions on all non technical car related topics

Moderator: The Mod Squad

new FWD drag racing rule.

Postby IH8TEC » Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:45 pm

Copied from deanis's post on nzhonda's

just been looking through this seasons nzdra rule book and saw this one on page 79:

5.40 all front wheel drive or transverse mounted.

Applications using a clutch and running 11.99 or quicker, shield must surround the bellhousing completely except for area of bellhousing adjacent to differential and axle shaft. shield may be multi piece, with pieces bolted together using minimum M10 class 8.8 bolts;may be attatched to engine and/or bellhousing mounting points. the sheild should be constructed as above. SFI spec bellhousing blanket acceptable in place of a shield.

this will only affect a few of the fwd cars as you must be below the 11.99ET but the way i interpret this you also must have one on every mitsi that runs that and that is A LOT of cars.

as far as i know they didnt inforce this at the last nightwars but it might not be long before we all end up like the rotary boys. no blanket, no racing.

there will be a few of us needing this, i will in the near future :D
Current Rides: 1994 Hiace Custom
KTM 250sx

Previous Car: 1988 Toyota Levin 4agte
234kw atw and 12.5@183kmh
Sold to a muppit who wrecked it
Hmm
User avatar
IH8TEC
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:11 pm

Re: new FWD drag racing rule.

Postby deanis » Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:13 pm

IH8TEC wrote:there will be a few of us needing this, i will in the near future :D
i think i saw that on a tui billboard somewhere. perhaps you mean like starwars: a gallaxy in the future, far far away.

may as well put one on while your engine is out though!
12.7@174kph. no turbo, no supercharger, no NOS, ALLMOTOR.
User avatar
deanis
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 75
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2006 9:33 pm

Postby flygt4 » Thu Nov 15, 2007 7:31 pm

bet you it drops the number of evos a bit. other than that it would mostly affect the quicker turbo hondas and maybe the odd fwd toyota :lol:

what else is tranverse engine that you see a lot of running in the 11's?

edit: would affect mr2's as well?
User avatar
flygt4
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3820
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 6:57 pm
Location: Wellington

Postby Bling » Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:21 pm

flygt4 wrote:edit: would affect mr2's as well?


Only if you do your run in reverse :wink:
User avatar
Bling
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 15990
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Quake City

Postby postfach » Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:54 pm

BZG|Bling wrote:
flygt4 wrote:edit: would affect mr2's as well?


Only if you do your run in reverse :wink:


perhaps i'm missing some obvious sarcasm here, but as i understand it, this would also include mr2s, since the engine is mounted transverse
User avatar
postfach
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2205
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:45 pm
Location: North Shore, Auckland

Postby Bling » Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:10 pm

yeah I was only joking...... forgot the [sarcism] tags that time ;)
User avatar
Bling
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 15990
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Quake City

Postby IH8TEC » Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:52 pm

i'm gonna have a talk to dean at work tomorrow, but what is the difference between say a s2000 that revs to 9.5k and might run a high 12, compared to say barry's car that goes to 8k and does a 10. are they basing this decision on rpm the cars get to? (ie rotaries), where do they draw the line....

rotaries i can understand as they rev pretty damn high some of them. and are KNOWN to go.

has anyone heard of a fwd flywheel going through the casing and possibly the firewall?

i dont get that they put in that rule, yet have no specifics on what grade material it should be, what thickness it should be, no diagrams of where exactly it's meant to cover.

so many questions, not enough answers lol
Current Rides: 1994 Hiace Custom
KTM 250sx

Previous Car: 1988 Toyota Levin 4agte
234kw atw and 12.5@183kmh
Sold to a muppit who wrecked it
Hmm
User avatar
IH8TEC
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:11 pm

Postby snwtoy » Thu Nov 15, 2007 9:57 pm

IH8TEC wrote:has anyone heard of a fwd flywheel going through the casing and possibly the firewall?


Yeah, if they've been incorrectly lightened they can be prone to that, especially if you're running a ceramic clutch which heats the hell out of them so they develop cracks.
User avatar
snwtoy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5810
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 7:54 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby IH8TEC » Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:01 pm

snwtoy wrote:
IH8TEC wrote:has anyone heard of a fwd flywheel going through the casing and possibly the firewall?


Yeah, if they've been incorrectly lightened they can be prone to that, especially if you're running a ceramic clutch which heats the hell out of them so they develop cracks.


i know it COULD happen, but has anyone ever seen pics of it happening in a fwd? i'm too too worried abotu how my car is, gbox is on passenger side anyway,

it seems to be like they havent' thought this rule through very much because they need to sort the finer details out.

or am i missing something
Current Rides: 1994 Hiace Custom
KTM 250sx

Previous Car: 1988 Toyota Levin 4agte
234kw atw and 12.5@183kmh
Sold to a muppit who wrecked it
Hmm
User avatar
IH8TEC
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:11 pm

Postby Truenotch » Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:20 pm

BZG|Bling wrote:
flygt4 wrote:edit: would affect mr2's as well?


Only if you do your run in reverse :wink:


IH8TEC wrote:5.40 all front wheel drive OR transverse mounted.


That pretty much means MR2's aswell, but oh well :P , AW's are to slow for that and SW's always seem to blow up before getting there :roll: :P .
User avatar
Truenotch
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1960
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Hamilton

Postby Bazda » Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:04 pm

what a pain in the A hole.
well my engines still out, I just put the gearbox back together 2nite, so i guess i'll try fidn more info in this stupid thing before I bolt it all back into the car
1988 Toyota Levin GTZ 410kw atw @26psi
Join us on facebook - MRP - Manon Racing Products
http://www.mrpltd.co.nz
Turbonetics|Fortune Auto Coilovers|Wilwood brakes|Tilton clutches|
User avatar
Bazda
Toyspeed Sponsor
 
Posts: 5713
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2002 10:32 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby Adamal » Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:29 pm

So is this due to something happening or just forward thinking?
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
User avatar
Adamal
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 11592
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:01 pm
Location: Waitakere Drift Stage (Ranges)

Postby Jdawg » Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:29 am

IH8TEC wrote:i'm gonna have a talk to dean at work tomorrow, but what is the difference between say a s2000 that revs to 9.5k and might run a high 12, compared to say barry's car that goes to 8k and does a 10. are they basing this decision on rpm the cars get to? (ie rotaries), where do they draw the line....

rotaries i can understand as they rev pretty damn high some of them. and are KNOWN to go.

has anyone heard of a fwd flywheel going through the casing and possibly the firewall?

i dont get that they put in that rule, yet have no specifics on what grade material it should be, what thickness it should be, no diagrams of where exactly it's meant to cover.

so many questions, not enough answers lol

Not just rpm's. It also includes the amount of HP/Torque you are putting thru the flywheel/clutch. The big bang doesn't just go thru the firewall, it will send shrapnel in all directions, including at things like fuel systems and even spectators
Jdawg
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 637
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby barryogen » Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:34 am

IH8TEC wrote:has anyone heard of a fwd flywheel going through the casing and possibly the firewall?


Ages ago I had a video of this happening in a Toyota scion(I think) in the US at a drag day during staging.

It disintegrated, and threw shrapnel everywhere, the guy was fine, but the engine was shagged, had been shaken apart by the vibration of bits of flywheel that were left on it.

firewall had stopped the small bits, some of the larger bits went through, but missed the driver entirely.

Bonnet was full of holes, and tears from the large bits of metal thrown through it
It could definitly kill, the holes were rather large, and well embedded in roof of the car etc.
User avatar
barryogen
2ZZ Guru in training
 
Posts: 2692
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:38 am
Location: Dunedin

Postby flygt4 » Fri Nov 16, 2007 3:51 pm

ok we all know why they make you do it.

what i don't get is, what is the difference between a transverse engined car running under 12sec and a longitudal engined car runinng less than 12sec? (other than around 10mph :lol: )
User avatar
flygt4
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3820
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 6:57 pm
Location: Wellington

Postby barryogen » Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:13 pm

flygt4 wrote:what i don't get is, what is the difference between a transverse engined car running under 12sec and a longitudal engined car runinng less than 12sec? (other than around 10mph :lol: )


where the flywheel would be disintergrating to?
Where does a longitudinal flywheel go if/when it goes... wouldn't it be at or slightly infront of the firewall, so much less likely to hit the driver(although more likely to hit those beside the car like spectators)
User avatar
barryogen
2ZZ Guru in training
 
Posts: 2692
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:38 am
Location: Dunedin

Postby IH8TEC » Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:34 pm

rotaries have to i beleive, they have kevlar blankets, but thats about $3-400.

most rwd's if it goes bang it's gonna go right where your feet are.
Current Rides: 1994 Hiace Custom
KTM 250sx

Previous Car: 1988 Toyota Levin 4agte
234kw atw and 12.5@183kmh
Sold to a muppit who wrecked it
Hmm
User avatar
IH8TEC
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3128
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2003 7:11 pm

Postby flygt4 » Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:00 pm

yeah my thinking was you're going to lose your feet or lower parts of legs in a longitudal setup.
in a 4age setup its just your passengers crotch and its a honda its your crotch. :lol:

i appreciate the point they are trying to make, but it doesnt seem to be consistent, and i'm sure there are more pressing safety concerns to be addressed in drag racing.

my pick would be externally venting wastegates inside engine bays. theres a whole lotta flames and heat coming out of those things , and loads of flammable stuff around the engine.
User avatar
flygt4
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3820
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 6:57 pm
Location: Wellington

Postby TTEETT » Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:34 pm

Check this out!

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
TTEETT
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 9:09 pm
Location: Papakua

Postby Truenotch » Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:38 pm

Rotaries are really bad for it because apparently they only have 1 bolt flywheels....
User avatar
Truenotch
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1960
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: Hamilton

Next

Return to General Car Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 36 guests