Why do car makers do things to annoy mechanics!!!

General discussions on all non technical car related topics

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby MAC_HATER » Fri May 11, 2012 11:28 am

a neighbour down my street has a "phat rota" as he puts it - a 12A in a bugeye Mazda station wagon - running a 4" exhaust system to a "phat dumpy" as he calls it - its loud as hell and he loves to leave it sitting idling in the driveway for half an hour at 6am every morning when he leaves for work - he then leaves and i get up to go to go to work and the whole street is impassable with dense fog - oh wait thats just the smoke from the phat rota burning 3L of oil in that idle time it sits there >_<

"its not rooted thats just how they run"

tui ad much?
Image
~SlideWays~: Cars + Males = Single, therefore: Poptarts?
User avatar
MAC_HATER
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1071
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:35 am
Location: Invercargill

Postby d1 mule » Fri May 11, 2012 12:08 pm

jaypines wrote:
d1 mule wrote:I fail to see how the rotary is a bad design.

fine me another 1.3 liter car that makes over 250hp.......


more like 2.6L compared to normal 4 stroke engine.... 8O



because good design...


matt dunn wrote:
we have a 1.3L engine that makes 380hp at the wheels.........


haha iv read your thread, hardly a standard engine. For the money youve spent the rotary could prob 500 whp.


dont get me wrong they have their fsults but wanking on that they are worse than alfas and fiats it just crazy.

and as for the "not 1.3L" They are advertised, Sold and Registered as 1.3L. Just because they have 3 combuston strokes per "crank" revolution doesnt mean they have any more displacement, they have good design. 8)

also how are they not a 4 stroke engine? that still have inlet, compression, ignition and exhaust "strokes"??
d1 mule
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1790
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: perth, WA

Postby Shrike » Fri May 11, 2012 1:06 pm

d1 mule wrote:I fail to see how the rotary is a bad design.

fine me another 1.3 liter car that makes over 250hp.......


granted it was a 1.4 but the twincharged vw engine springs to mind and is a dam sight more reliable and doesnt have to be rebuilt as often
Why dream it when you can live it
User avatar
Shrike
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 731
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:05 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby Mr Revhead » Fri May 11, 2012 1:20 pm

:lol: Wtf. If you are going to compare hp. Then you need to compare apple's with apples. Which is power strokes per crank rpm. Suddenly the rotor is thirsty and huge.
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby BZG Wagon » Fri May 11, 2012 2:07 pm

What are you moaning about?

You presumably charge stuff out by the hour. You should be thanking Mazda for keeping you in business and helping your profit margins.

And lets face it - Japanese engineers won't give a sh*t about the mechanic servicing the car two decades after they build it.
User avatar
BZG Wagon
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1573
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 10:28 pm
Location: Waitakere City, Auckland.

Postby Mr Revhead » Fri May 11, 2012 2:14 pm

Still, wouldn't feel right not ranting about the designers ancestry! :lol:
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby bzrspeed » Fri May 11, 2012 2:29 pm

BZG Wagon wrote:What are you moaning about?

You presumably charge stuff out by the hour. You should be thanking Mazda for keeping you in business and helping your profit margins.

And lets face it - Japanese engineers won't give a sh*t about the mechanic servicing the car two decades after they build it.


Boss make money not me, I just annoyed, thats all.

Its that annoying sound from rx-7, bap bap bap bap bap bap bap sounds like 50cc scooter. Maybe buy 50cc scooter for boot when wankel breaks.. maybe Mazda should sell as optional extra.

Off to work on TOYOTA landcruiser. Nice and easy
bzrspeed
 

Postby rollaholic » Fri May 11, 2012 2:57 pm

power vs displacement is a pointless comparison for reasons already stated. better to compare how efficently it makes that power (ie how well it converts petrol to torque)

if it were truly a superior design, it would exceed the piston engine in this department and we would all be driving them :lol: :? :P

PS i love how a thread about transverse V6s can turn into a ROTORS R SHIT thread inside of two pages
BASU!
User avatar
rollaholic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5383
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:19 am
Location: West is Best

Postby S T E A L T H » Fri May 11, 2012 3:06 pm

Unrelated subject entirely but still kinda on the same topic.

Recently had noticed that one of our cars - a 2008 Maxima (NZ New) has started to shudder a tad under sharp acceleration. Took it in and the mechanics diagnosed (correctly) a $&#$% engine mount. A massive job to get to the back one, removed subframe etc. ( Walked in to check up on at lunchtime, found half a 500m2 workshop floor space covered by parts of my car...decided to wait for the phonecall)

Picked up the car (and the $1200 repair bill) the following day, good as gold, and got shown the old engine mount. It has a wire and a sensor going into it!! As it turned out, in their infinite wisdom Nissan have decided it would be a good idea to make an engine mount which hardens or softens depending on whether you're in forward or reverse..with a chamber of silicone fluid in it. which probably contributed to the fact that it was completely worn out on a 3.5 year old car with 128000km. (conveniently just out of warranty).

Got replaced by a solid aftermarket mount, no difference whatsoever to vibration level compared to how it was before the original one $&#$% out...and will probably last as long as the car.

Perfect example of a carmaker trying to be clever and fix a non-existant problem
-2010 Toyota Landcruiser VX
User avatar
S T E A L T H
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Auckland

Postby Dell'Orto » Fri May 11, 2012 4:41 pm

You'll find they spent all that money designing that mount to shift the resonance frequency of the car down 2.5hz :lol:
Re rotor hate - stock ones dont go brap brap...funnily enough massive camshaft overlap makes piston motors make the same noise.
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby bzrspeed » Fri May 11, 2012 5:01 pm

heavy cam modified 4 cyl making bap bap bap is ok cause they have pistons and do not go round and around and around like a majic-doodle.
bzrspeed
 

Postby GTTpower » Fri May 11, 2012 5:36 pm

bzrspeed wrote:heavy cam modified 4 cyl making bap bap bap is ok cause they have pistons and do not go round and around and around like a majic-doodle.


Do you even listen to what you are saying 8O
1999 SXE10 Altezza RS200Z
2004 Honda SCV100
Previous: 1993 EP85 Starlet, 1984 KP60 Starlet
Steam/Origin ID: nzEP85
User avatar
GTTpower
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1160
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 8:47 am
Location: Hamilton

Postby bzrspeed » Fri May 11, 2012 5:38 pm

GTTpower wrote:
bzrspeed wrote:heavy cam modified 4 cyl making bap bap bap is ok cause they have pistons and do not go round and around and around like a majic-doodle.


Do you even listen to what you are saying 8O


i dont understand, i typed it, not say it please explain? Did i spell wrong? Spell check did not come up.
bzrspeed
 

Postby Mr Revhead » Fri May 11, 2012 5:41 pm

GTTpower wrote:
bzrspeed wrote:heavy cam modified 4 cyl making bap bap bap is ok cause they have pistons and do not go round and around and around like a majic-doodle.


Do you even listen to what you are saying 8O


Obviously English is not his first language, so cut some slack :wink:
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby bzrspeed » Fri May 11, 2012 5:46 pm

gtt are you ask what is majic doodle? Its russian toy, like page of paper size, you use special pen on circles and squares and triangles inside and hit walls and it makes nice pictures. Very popular in my home country. I thought you might have here, but maybe i wrong yes? Maybe just russian toy.
bzrspeed
 

Postby Mr Revhead » Fri May 11, 2012 5:49 pm

We have them here.

I think he didn't realise you are not originally from here andwas confused by they way you phrase some things. While not always correct its not hard to understand
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby Mr. Mainstream » Fri May 11, 2012 5:58 pm

bzrspeed wrote:
Still dont like mazda, i hear wankel engine going bap bap bap bap all time, make me feel sad, . Engine make funny noise and not good design.


bzrspeed wrote:Its that annoying sound from rx-7, bap bap bap bap bap bap bap sounds like 50cc scooter. Maybe buy 50cc scooter for boot when wankel breaks


:lol: :lol: :lol: bzrspeeed is my favourite new member

Just harden up Bzrspeed,
NZers are working on them and cunty cars all day.
No need to start a thread. smell troll
Current:77 MK2 Ford Escort L 1.3L
75 MK2 Ford Escort L 2.1L

Had: 2X Early Subaru Leggys GT Wags, 1X Subaru RS, 1X 2004 Subaru B4, 2x BFMP Turbo Sedan Famil's, 2x BFMR Turbo Sedan Famil's, AE92 FX-GT, 97 Holden Calais 3.8L
Supercharged 12psi ,Escort, BZ-R
Various Others
RomanV wrote: Mr Mainstream: The king of the Pushrods?!
User avatar
Mr. Mainstream
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Skoping for my Mazda in ChCh

Postby bzrspeed » Fri May 11, 2012 6:10 pm

ok, i didnt know i should not start post. I do not have idea how to remove sorry.

I start cause i was annoy at stupid mazda. That is all. Sorry
bzrspeed
 

Postby Mr. Mainstream » Fri May 11, 2012 6:16 pm

BTW. Here a vid about Allan Moffat talking about the reliability of the rx-7 Before bathurst 1981. quite interesting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwwVlm_Ozv0
Current:77 MK2 Ford Escort L 1.3L
75 MK2 Ford Escort L 2.1L

Had: 2X Early Subaru Leggys GT Wags, 1X Subaru RS, 1X 2004 Subaru B4, 2x BFMP Turbo Sedan Famil's, 2x BFMR Turbo Sedan Famil's, AE92 FX-GT, 97 Holden Calais 3.8L
Supercharged 12psi ,Escort, BZ-R
Various Others
RomanV wrote: Mr Mainstream: The king of the Pushrods?!
User avatar
Mr. Mainstream
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Skoping for my Mazda in ChCh

Postby rollaholic » Fri May 11, 2012 7:22 pm

bzrspeed wrote:ok, i didnt know i should not start post. I do not have idea how to remove sorry.

I start cause i was annoy at stupid mazda. That is all. Sorry


its fine to post about this kinda stuff imho

the mods will soon let you know if something is out of line
BASU!
User avatar
rollaholic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 5383
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 2:19 am
Location: West is Best

PreviousNext

Return to General Car Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 17 guests