New camber rules for certs

General discussions on all non technical car related topics

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby Akane » Thu May 17, 2012 4:28 pm

Thank god, hopefully they will put an end to this "Stance" bullshit.
No "stance", no "hellaflush", none of that bullshit. Nothing but no grip on full boost.
http://www.lol.co.nz/ random shit.
User avatar
Akane
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4073
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 2:08 am
Location: Auckland

Postby wde_bdy » Thu May 17, 2012 4:31 pm

Akane wrote:Thank god, hopefully they will put an end to this "Stance" bullshit.


The problems is most of those cars probably aren't certed anyway.

Callum
Image
User avatar
wde_bdy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2704
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 11:43 pm
Location: Gisborne

Postby sergei » Thu May 17, 2012 4:34 pm

Yeah camber, muscle cars don't need it and thats all it matter (for people who make the rules).
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby siren676 » Thu May 17, 2012 4:41 pm

Well im probably screwed for my retest :(
1998 5dr Glanza V Replica - 5E-FHE powered

1990 Mazda MX5 NA6C drift build - Met a wall 2/5/15
User avatar
siren676
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1015
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:47 pm
Location: South Auckland

Postby Mr Revhead » Thu May 17, 2012 4:42 pm

Hmmm early Imps had positive camber....
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby Mr Revhead » Thu May 17, 2012 4:43 pm

Hmmm early Imps had positive camber....
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby tsoob » Thu May 17, 2012 5:14 pm

wde_bdy wrote:
Akane wrote:Thank god, hopefully they will put an end to this "Stance" bullshit.


The problems is most of those cars probably aren't certed anyway.

Callum


exactally my point, those that want to do it legally can't even do it now due to laws.

Daniel, we are probably best to put those falken tyres on it and try your luck.
Platinum Wheels
15 Parkway Drive
Mairangi Bay
09 486 5317
WHEELS, TYRES & SUSPENSION!
www.platinumwheels.co.nz
User avatar
tsoob
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3253
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 7:37 pm
Location: 201.1kw on 19psi

Postby tsoob » Thu May 17, 2012 5:15 pm

1I1 wrote:Going off that guide the certifier has to do a road test and provided it meets the standards (comes down braking safely etc) then you can have more than half a degree of camber.

Again thats subjective to tyre width etc isn't it?


acutally no, it doesnt count for the difference in tyre width, i asked him about that and its not taken into consideration, 'because they run bald tyres'
Platinum Wheels
15 Parkway Drive
Mairangi Bay
09 486 5317
WHEELS, TYRES & SUSPENSION!
www.platinumwheels.co.nz
User avatar
tsoob
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3253
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 7:37 pm
Location: 201.1kw on 19psi

Postby wde_bdy » Thu May 17, 2012 5:57 pm

tsoob wrote:After taking to them I had the director of Autolign NZ here, and he is also dealing with the very same people at the moment to get the TEIN brand of coilovers through their stringent processes, these guys are second guessing (assuming they know more than the manufacturers) even good quality JAPANESE brands now.


That is a specific issue around welding to cast, ANY manufacture using the process needs to go through this with destructive testing or with appropriate certified quality control processes. Based on some of the stuff sold in NZ it was definitely needed, will only affect certain cars.
viewtopic.php?t=87735

Callum
Image
User avatar
wde_bdy
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 2704
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 11:43 pm
Location: Gisborne

Postby Dell'Orto » Thu May 17, 2012 7:33 pm

I take it Tony Johnson isnt with LVVTA anymore? I can understand how they dont want road cars driving around with 3 degrees of negative camber, but how can they say my car with substantially lowered suspension can only be set to .1 degree positive camber?
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby tsoob » Thu May 17, 2012 7:40 pm

yeah I covered a lot of that with the Don, the big man at autolign.. it will be passed, the meeting is june 5.

Simple fact is that it is no longer up to a certifier to say if they 'certify' a car to be safe, its now up to the guys at lvv in wellington to approve that they say its safe.
Platinum Wheels
15 Parkway Drive
Mairangi Bay
09 486 5317
WHEELS, TYRES & SUSPENSION!
www.platinumwheels.co.nz
User avatar
tsoob
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3253
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 7:37 pm
Location: 201.1kw on 19psi

Postby Makaveli » Thu May 17, 2012 10:49 pm

I do agree with "excessive" negative camber on some cars which decreases the tyre patch contact with the road surface and makes it more dangerous, but since I have lowered my car, the rear has a little bit of negative camber, not sure of the degrees, but I wouldn't say it's excessive. I was going to go for a Cert. Does this mean I won't get a cert? I haven't got a wheel alignment sheet as they normally give you a print out after alignment.

Looking at car pics on the net - I would say my rear wheels have about 3 degrees of Negative camber.
Last edited by Makaveli on Thu May 17, 2012 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Makaveli
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 297
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 4:50 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby Bling » Thu May 17, 2012 10:52 pm

As with lots of things. People push the limits, rules get changed so they can't take the piss, everyone loses.
User avatar
Bling
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 15990
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Quake City

Postby iOnic » Thu May 17, 2012 11:10 pm

Half a degree outside of stock spec is bugger all. Pretty much, if you have any more/less camber than stock, you will fail a cert. Unless you use your car for motorsport a couple times a year. Then it's suddenly safe for road use and will pass the cert in spite of probably having the same suspension as the car that just failed.

Makes perfect sense.
Faber est suae quisque fortunae
2009 Mazda3 MPS
2016 CFMoto 650NKs
2013 Hyundai IX35 Highlander
User avatar
iOnic
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:31 pm
Location: Melbourne VIC

Postby 2jz tt Aristo » Thu May 17, 2012 11:10 pm

This is bullshit.............
2jz tt Aristo
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 7:40 am
Location: Auckland

Postby siren676 » Thu May 17, 2012 11:18 pm

hands up whos car is now illegal :x
1998 5dr Glanza V Replica - 5E-FHE powered

1990 Mazda MX5 NA6C drift build - Met a wall 2/5/15
User avatar
siren676
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1015
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:47 pm
Location: South Auckland

Postby Bling » Thu May 17, 2012 11:22 pm

Yours has been for ages, so what's new? :lol:

TBH I think we have it pretty good here. Without a cert you can get away with quite lot of modifying. Not to sound like a party pooper, but it does concern me it's like that. But only because people do things in unsafe manners. Anything done without need a cert is almost using a loophole.

If you need the extra camber just join a motorsport club and do some events to use that 'loophole'.
User avatar
Bling
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 15990
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 9:02 pm
Location: Quake City

Postby siren676 » Thu May 17, 2012 11:26 pm

BZG|Bling wrote:Yours has been for ages, so what's new? :lol:

:lol: shhh....
1998 5dr Glanza V Replica - 5E-FHE powered

1990 Mazda MX5 NA6C drift build - Met a wall 2/5/15
User avatar
siren676
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1015
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 1:47 pm
Location: South Auckland

Postby Mr Revhead » Thu May 17, 2012 11:46 pm

To be honest I don't think there are going to be many mainstream cars that will need more than .5 more than of factory specs.
It says negative, most fwd cars only need a little more front and LESS rear to handle better.

And if for some reason you do need more camber. Cert it in legal spec, and then add more camber. Can't tell me cops and wof guys wil be checking camber unless it's obviously waaaay out. And if it is, chances are you are a tool.
Being the subject of E-whinges since 2004 8)

http://www.centralmotorsport.org.nz/home

Image
User avatar
Mr Revhead
SECURITY!
 
Posts: 24635
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Nelson

Postby nz_climber » Thu May 17, 2012 11:46 pm

I think its a good idea, but probably need to go out to 1 degree on top of manufactures specs.

Also think something needs to be done about the modified cars that don't need a cert that get away with lots, but those of us that do get a cert are subjected to all these extra rules.

I reckon there needs to be a limit on camber etc at WOF time and if you want to exceed this then you need a cert (like the 100mm ride height rule)

Unsure how this will effect scratch built cars - guess I will find out in the next week as my car is currently in for cert.
nz_climber
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2003 10:29 pm
Location: Bulls

PreviousNext

Return to General Car Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests