Quint wrote:so many haters. it's always good to see a bunch of 'car enthusiasts' bag a guy for being enthusiastic about his car.
talk about the green eyed monster, eh?
+1
The fastest car is always in the car park too. Don't ever forget that.
Moderator: The Mod Squad
Quint wrote:so many haters. it's always good to see a bunch of 'car enthusiasts' bag a guy for being enthusiastic about his car.
talk about the green eyed monster, eh?
dnalunchie wrote:Again I am not trying to bag on the original poster its just it seems many people who do similar builds never hold on to them for long and there must be a reason why
Al wrote:Quint wrote:so many haters. it's always good to see a bunch of 'car enthusiasts' bag a guy for being enthusiastic about his car.
talk about the green eyed monster, eh?
+1
The fastest car is always in the car park too. Don't ever forget that.
fangsport wrote:i have never seen the point in rediculously powerful 'road only' cars especially if they arn't they whole package
Flannelman wrote:Honestly, top marks to the man on the kW number. Hell, the dam number looks like with more revs it would keep climbing.
Yet looking on other international sites I found the biggest power anyone has got is 735hp from a 4age based engine. Also, the 20v head has issues with valvesprings. There simply isnt enough room to fit bigger springs to lift the seat pressure and with boost pressures aproching 35+psi, the valves get held off the seats. Also, the crank needs more support as the caps begin to move altering berring clearance resulting in failed berrings.
Im confident that I could build something that could be this powerful, but I never will because of the cost to build not just the engine but the chassis to contain such a monster. And it would be only good for one thing - straight line speed.
This is knowledge gained by research and experince. Experince tells me that torque is far more important than a single kW figure. If I had a choice to get 5Nm of torque @ 3000rpm or 5kW @ 7500 im going to choose the 5Nm as I will feel this more often.
If anything, car magazines that plaster kW ratings all over the front cover and glorify the drivers of such vehicles as gods influence young minds. When they get there first car, they then expect a kW figure and pay anything to get it.
As for green eyed monster? My 292000km old, original 20v st makes a tyre sqealing 84kWs, turns 16.1sec 1/4 mile times, burns a litre of oil every 1000km yet I've now got it to return almost 800km from a tank of gas. As a daily driven 1600cc, what more do you want?
thegreatestben wrote:It's lucky you arent a douchebag other wise I wouldn't help you
Bazda wrote:Its got a 7afe block in it.
The guy rang me yesterday to say he stripped 3rd gear. No surprise as he was running the smaller E series. He pretty much didnt have any idea about the car as he brought it off someone else who got it built by x person.
20v 7agte. Those numbers are not un expected! If I can make 360kw atw on 98 pump gas with a stock head then 400kw is easy on E85.
With a worked head 450kw+ would be doable, I was building an engine to do this and still plan to later in the future
2jayzgte wrote:I wonder if this guy has spent as much on his brakes and suspension as he has on under the bonnet mods....
I wonder if he turned upto a track and thrashed it beyond belief if it would last the day at that high boost number,hmmm I suspect not but I'd bet there be a good raft of excuses though..
spoonza6 wrote:Spend lots of $$$ building high powered car only to become trailer/garage queen cause too scared it might break when driven
Spend half amount of $$$ building mid powered car which is enjoyed on a daily basis without much concern of it breaking
4ageboi wrote:hey man yeap sti brembos with 5 stud conversion and adusties and a half cage i think last time i saw it...
4ageboi wrote:2jayzgte wrote:I wonder if this guy has spent as much on his brakes and suspension as he has on under the bonnet mods....
I wonder if he turned upto a track and thrashed it beyond belief if it would last the day at that high boost number,hmmm I suspect not but I'd bet there be a good raft of excuses though..
hey man yeap sti brembos with 5 stud conversion and adusties and a half cage i think last time i saw it...
Flannelman wrote:This is knowledge gained by research and experince. Experince tells me that torque is far more important than a single kW figure. If I had a choice to get 5Nm of torque @ 3000rpm or 5kW @ 7500 im going to choose the 5Nm as I will feel this more often.
Leon wrote:Most people would find it bizarre that my race car runs an utterly stock as a rock silvertop putting out dunno how many powers (cos it has never been put on a dyno). But I like doing a zillion events at low speed, as I don't have a rebuild budget.
Return to General Car Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests