why not celica?

General discussions on all non technical car related topics

Moderator: The Mod Squad

Postby Adamal » Wed Feb 08, 2006 6:32 am

RomanV wrote:
GT4-SUM wrote:lol are you saying DUH to All_Fours???? coz he doz know his sh*t about 3s's man


And All_fours doesnt know sh*t about 3S's BTW. :P :P :P :P
I believe that sarcasm is what Adamal was going for


Yes. That would be correct.

And All_fours really doesn't know shit about 3S's. Silly billy can't even tell the difference between a 3SGTE and a 4AGZE! Just look at his car now!
Motorsport is like sex. You could take it to track and have a long, enjoyable session, or you could take it to the strip and get it over with in less than 20 seconds.
User avatar
Adamal
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 11592
Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 4:01 pm
Location: Waitakere Drift Stage (Ranges)

Postby Silent Knight » Wed Feb 08, 2006 7:36 am

markbrown06 wrote:ill chop all use skyline boys!! http://www.cardomain.com/ride/752297/1


I've seen allot of Celicas in NZ that are allot lower than that. Yours looks like a tractor from the photos on that site.

I don't see what the hype is about really...it's not even an RC. And 185s are generally ugly bar 1 or 2 of them.

I doubt that would beat any Skylines...maybe old ones....R30 or 31 maybe? ...if my grandma was driving?
Image
User avatar
Silent Knight
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 6188
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 12:30 am
Location: 'Save the Whale Foundation'

Postby peas » Wed Feb 08, 2006 9:54 am

markbrown06 wrote:ill chop all use skyline boys!! http://www.cardomain.com/ride/752297/1


Thats some serious weight reduction right there! 1290... lbs!! Thats... 586kg. No wonder it does 0-60 in 3.6 seconds.

I have always liked these Celicas, nice to drive just hated filling it up and fixing it which happend a lot. If I ever got another one it would be the 205 but by the time I'm looking at my next car they will all have 170-200km on them and just starting to enter the "I've had enough" period where they may as well be holding a gun to your head demanding that you empty your wallet for repairs.
'97 Caldina GT (ST215G)
User avatar
peas
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 11:30 am
Location: North Shore

Postby GT4 20 » Wed Feb 08, 2006 8:28 pm

My reasoning for buying a GT4 was that, at the time, there weren't many around - though there seem to be more and more imports around these days.
There are parts out there - you just have to look a bit harder. You can get decent power out of them and while they may not be the quickest on the drag strip, they will certainly out handle a lot of performance cars along the tight twisty stuff with a few tweaks to the chassis. After all, they were designed for rallying rather than for the drag strip.
Gary
1999 Subaru Legacy B4 RSK TT
GT4 20
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1086
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 5:03 pm
Location: Auckland

Postby markbrown06 » Thu Feb 09, 2006 8:41 pm

Thats some serious weight reduction right there! 1290... lbs!! Thats... 586kg.

hmm another person who over rates the weight of the st185 gt-four
and of cours the waight was fully striped interior :)
4wd dohnuts in da GT-FOUR our
User avatar
markbrown06
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 5:55 pm

Postby RomanV » Thu Feb 09, 2006 8:59 pm

GT4 20 wrote:You can get decent power out of them and while they may not be the quickest on the drag strip, they will certainly out handle a lot of performance cars along the tight twisty stuff with a few tweaks to the chassis. After all, they were designed for rallying rather than for the drag strip.
Gary


(IIRC) Celica has the most WRC wins out of any car that has competed. 8)

Whether or not that can be attributed to cheating however, is up for debate. :lol:

Also (:twisted:) it pays to note that a brilliant rally car on gravel and mud etc. doesnt necessarily make for a great tarmac car....

The front wheel drive citroen Xsara Kit Car used to beat 4wd WRC cars on the tarmac. 8)
Infact, IIRC, FWD citroen Xsaras won the French and Spanish rally stages one year. 8) (As these stages are predominantly/all tarmac)
User avatar
RomanV
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4915
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:17 am
Location: West Auckland

Postby markbrown06 » Thu Feb 09, 2006 8:59 pm

I think I might have seen this guy at the autosalon the first year it was held. Telling everyone all this sh*t about his car, so I went to have a look and it was practically stock. He told everyone else it did a 11.4 but when I asked he said it was a 12.4. My guess would have been 15.4 .
txt speak isnt tolerated - you have a full keyboard USE IT - Mmm, Boost
4wd dohnuts in da GT-FOUR our
User avatar
markbrown06
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 5:55 pm

Postby fangsport » Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:16 pm

RomanV wrote:
(IIRC) Celica has the most WRC wins out of any car that has competed. 8)

Whether or not that can be attributed to cheating however, is up for debate. :lol:

Also (:twisted:) it pays to note that a brilliant rally car on gravel and mud etc. doesnt necessarily make for a great tarmac car....

The front wheel drive citroen Xsara Kit Car used to beat 4wd WRC cars on the tarmac. 8)
Infact, IIRC, FWD citroen Xsaras won the French and Spanish rally stages one year. 8) (As these stages are predominantly/all tarmac)
Formula 2 Pugeot 206, wasn't it? Delacour at the wheel?
I've been a bad bad boy. I should read the rules and behave before I get spanked by an admin

f#@k you i won't do what ya tell me

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Fangwood/225658970893404
fangsport
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4169
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Timaru

Postby RomanV » Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:29 pm

Well it was the frenchies that were the big fwd fans at the time, so it wouldnt surprise me if there were pugeots in there too.

But either way, the fwds ate the 4wds for breakfast.
User avatar
RomanV
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4915
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:17 am
Location: West Auckland

Postby Malcolm » Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:46 pm

markbrown06 wrote:
I think I might have seen this guy at the autosalon the first year it was held. Telling everyone all this sh*t about his car, so I went to have a look and it was practically stock. He told everyone else it did a 11.4 but when I asked he said it was a 12.4. My guess would have been 15.4 .
txt speak isnt tolerated - you have a full keyboard USE IT - Mmm, Boost


aw man, what did he say?
User avatar
Malcolm
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4631
Joined: Tue May 14, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Auckland

Postby Dell'Orto » Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:50 pm

All_Fours wrote:
markbrown06 wrote:
I think I might have seen this guy at the autosalon the first year it was held. Telling everyone all this sh*t about his car, so I went to have a look and it was practically stock. He told everyone else it did a 11.4 but when I asked he said it was a 12.4. My guess would have been 15.4 .
txt speak isnt tolerated - you have a full keyboard USE IT - Mmm, Boost


aw man, what did he say?


I dont know! Something about feeling tough or something? Im usually pretty good at deciphering txt speak, but that was over my head.
1988 KE70 Wagon - Slowly rusting
1990 NA6 MX-5 - because reasons
2018 Ranger - Because workcar
1997 FD3S RX-7 Type R - all brap, all the time
OMG so shiny!

Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
User avatar
Dell'Orto
** Moderator **
 
Posts: 17494
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 5:07 am
Location: Straight out the ghetto, Lower Hutt

Postby fangsport » Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:02 pm

Mmm, Boost wrote:
All_Fours wrote:
markbrown06 wrote:
I think I might have seen this guy at the autosalon the first year it was held. Telling everyone all this sh*t about his car, so I went to have a look and it was practically stock. He told everyone else it did a 11.4 but when I asked he said it was a 12.4. My guess would have been 15.4 .
txt speak isnt tolerated - you have a full keyboard USE IT - Mmm, Boost


aw man, what did he say?


I dont know! Something about feeling tough or something? Im usually pretty good at deciphering txt speak, but that was over my head.


something about dodgey drinking water on the west coast makes him weak , as we are all so tough and drive mack-daddy cars, unlike him. :wink:
I've been a bad bad boy. I should read the rules and behave before I get spanked by an admin

f#@k you i won't do what ya tell me

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Fangwood/225658970893404
fangsport
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4169
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Timaru

Postby Jebus » Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:22 pm

markbrown06 wrote:
Thats some serious weight reduction right there! 1290... lbs!! Thats... 586kg.


hmm another person who over rates the weight of the st185 gt-four
and of cours the waight was fully striped interior :)


Well folks its true, the interior of a GT4 weighs roughly 800kg.
Jebus
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1780
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 8:21 pm
Location: Papakura

Postby TRD Man » Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:24 pm

RomanV wrote: the fwds ate the 4wds for breakfast.


Some did. Not many. You also need to take into account that the F2 cars ran to a totally different rule book than the GrpA 4WD cars.
User avatar
TRD Man
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1414
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 5:26 pm
Location: Lower Hutt

Postby fangsport » Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:36 pm

TRD Man wrote:
RomanV wrote: the fwds ate the 4wds for breakfast.


Some did. Not many. You also need to take into account that the F2 cars ran to a totally different rule book than the GrpA 4WD cars.
it was only because the group A Celica wasn't 1290lbs, as qouted by our freind from over the hill :lol:
I've been a bad bad boy. I should read the rules and behave before I get spanked by an admin

f#@k you i won't do what ya tell me

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Fangwood/225658970893404
fangsport
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 4169
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Timaru

Postby TRD Man » Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:48 pm

Not true. The F2 cars cars were lighter, had more engine freedoms which allowed the same theoretical 300hp the 4WD turbo cars had and, most significantly, were allowed wider tyres.
IIRC whilst Delecour & Panizzi gave the 4WD a fright and won a few stages only Bulgaski in the Citroen actually won an event (2 in fact).
remember that this was only on seal and the cars were French spec national championship cars which were allowed to be even lighter again than the WRC F2 cars.
And their drivers were tarmac specialists with extensive local knowledge.

Possibly not a level playing field.
User avatar
TRD Man
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 1414
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 5:26 pm
Location: Lower Hutt

Postby markbrown06 » Sat Feb 11, 2006 1:41 pm

it was only because the group A Celica wasn't 1290lbs, as qouted by our freind from over the hill


1400kg is the weight of the st185 celica standard.
4wd dohnuts in da GT-FOUR our
User avatar
markbrown06
Toyspeed Member
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 5:55 pm

Postby vvega » Sat Feb 11, 2006 2:36 pm

my st165 is 1250 on the wieghbridge


v
vvega
 

Postby sergei » Sat Feb 11, 2006 5:55 pm

vvega wrote:my st165 is 1250 on the wieghbridge


v


Is it stripped?
My 165 is stripped bar front seats/dash and doors, I also removed AC, and sound insulating material, and it really interesting to know how much it weights...
User avatar
sergei
Mad Russian
 
Posts: 8406
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 12:06 pm
Location: North Shore

Postby vvega » Sun Feb 12, 2006 5:46 pm

nope not stripped (half apart but all in the back seat :D)
thats with 2 subs in the back and a couple of amps under the seat
dunno how much gas cause myu fuel guage works in reverce :S

v
vvega
 

PreviousNext

Return to General Car Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 35 guests