Moderator: The Mod Squad
Quint wrote:Not just cock, large cock.
scotts2hot wrote:I honestly can't understand people saying that their dream car is a an ae-86.. it's a corolla! Have something to aspire to guys!
Mmm, Boost wrote:But how much of that "status" is because of the fact they cost so much? People of that kind of ilk tend to be snobby pricks who wont talk to you unless you're wearing a $3k suit.
I bet if some some reason the prices were reversed, they'd prefer TRD tweaked Century's over AMG Mercs.
vvega wrote:sory there but the celica started life RWD
vvega wrote:i also belive that teh st160 and 165 came out around teh same time, earliest st160 ive seen is 1986 and the earliest 165 ive seen is also 86
vvega wrote: all that still dosent make it a classic
vvega wrote:it is what the masses think
one man or in this case a small cult group cannot call a car a classic
vvega wrote: there really nothing specail about the ae-86 friom a engineering pont of view
vvega wrote: aside from winning a few races what makes teh ae-86 so specail as to deam it a classic ??
frost wrote:vvega wrote;
"these cars set the standerds of there era i cannot say the ae-86 did this"
"its just a cheap mass manufactured sports car"
thats Exactly whats the ae86 did! they where a mass produced sporty car that most ppl could afford, they where the first 16valve mass produced engined car that as available to the public. and yes ae86 was the first car to have the 4age, yes the cosworth 16valve was almost the same engine(in design) but could anyone get ahold of one? NO.
no_8wire wrote:I like Toyotas...but if some one offered me a F40....well yeah what can you say? A real sports car...
vvega wrote:oh and please dont compare a ae-86 with a bda
thats just insulting to somthign that has real racing heratage and is a true classic
Return to General Car Discussion
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 21 guests