MoNk wrote:....natural selection?
Can someone please explain this to me?
Because my understanding of natural selection never seems to have anything to do with the context in which people use it on forums.
Moderator: The Mod Squad
MoNk wrote:....natural selection?
scotty_ish wrote:What are the police doing about "the skids"?
Stupid people doing stupid things and dieing as a result.RomanV wrote:MoNk wrote:....natural selection?
Can someone please explain this to me?
Because my understanding of natural selection never seems to have anything to do with the context in which people use it on forums.
RobertC wrote:Stupid people doing stupid things and dieing as a result.RomanV wrote:MoNk wrote:....natural selection?
Can someone please explain this to me?
Because my understanding of natural selection never seems to have anything to do with the context in which people use it on forums.
Adamal wrote:RobertC wrote:Stupid people doing stupid things and dieing as a result.RomanV wrote:MoNk wrote:....natural selection?
Can someone please explain this to me?
Because my understanding of natural selection never seems to have anything to do with the context in which people use it on forums.
May have been suitable if it were the driver that died
Sideros wrote:Who's to say these "boy racers" are actually weak?
Sideros wrote:No that's weak in the mind. Natural selection deals primarily with physical strength.
Adamal wrote:
May have been suitable if it were the driver that died
Sideros wrote:No that's weak in the mind. Natural selection deals primarily with physical strength.
cat007 wrote:i.e. Natural selection is very similar to evolution
RomanV wrote:Adamal wrote:
May have been suitable if it were the driver that died
This is what I was getting at.
Natural selection is when a genetic inferiority in a particular situation makes it less feasible to procreate successfully.
If two people were running away from a bear, and one can run faster than the other because they're naturally bigger and stronger, and one gets eaten, that's natural selection.
It's not natural selection when someone hops into someones car for a ride, and ends up dying because the driver was a tard.
If the driver had no natural sense of balance and lost control of the car on account of it and killed themselves, that would be natural selection... And just an unlucky occurance for the passengers if there were any.
I dont understand the smug callousness that is associated with saying it, especially when it's not even in a relevant context.
"Well they were stupid for being a passenger in someones car, they deserve to die, it's natural selection at work!"
If someone deserved to die for hopping into someones car, the penalty for getting caught doing so would be the death penalty.
If they dont deserve to die for it, then why do people act smug when it happens?
It's also natural selection at work when a baby dies from a genetic disorder or heart failure or something.
It doesnt mean it's appropriate to say "Ha! Natural selection!" to the mother.
metal_sean_head wrote:Read an article about this in the star times today. 6 people in the car?! So thats one more person than there is seatbelts?
Return to General Car Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests